Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[MULTIARCH-3176] Release Notes add deprecation for z13, power8, x86v1 #53838

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 19, 2022
Merged

[MULTIARCH-3176] Release Notes add deprecation for z13, power8, x86v1 #53838

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 19, 2022

Conversation

SNiemann15
Copy link
Contributor

@SNiemann15 SNiemann15 commented Dec 14, 2022 •
edited

Version(s): 4.12

Issue: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/MULTIARCH-3176

Link to docs preview: https://53838--docspreview.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/release_notes/ocp-4-12-release-notes.html#ocp-4-12-z13-power8-x86v1-deprecations

QE review:

  • IBM Z: Holger Wolf
  • IBM Power: Manoj Kumar
  • x86: Mark Russell
  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

fyi @opayne1

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Dec 14, 2022
@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link

ocpdocs-previewbot commented Dec 14, 2022 •
edited

🤖 Updated build preview is available at:
https://53838--docspreview.netlify.app

Build log: https://circleci.com/gh/ocpdocs-previewbot/openshift-docs/5612

@SNiemann15 SNiemann15 changed the title Release Notes add deprecation for z13, power8, x86v1 [MULTIARCH-3176] Release Notes add deprecation for z13, power8, x86v1 Dec 14, 2022
@manojnkumar
Copy link

@SNiemann15: In addition to all POWER8 models, select POWER9 models will also be deprecated.

support for {op-system} functionality in IBM POWER8 all models, IBM POWER9 models AC922, IC922, LC922....

@SNiemann15 SNiemann15 force-pushed the deprecation_z13_power8 branch 2 times, most recently from 7331b48 to 028a6db Compare December 15, 2022 15:35
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Dec 15, 2022
@manojnkumar
Copy link

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 15, 2022
@holgwolf
Copy link

/lgtm

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 16, 2022

@holgwolf: changing LGTM is restricted to collaborators

In response to this:

/lgtm

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@SNiemann15
Copy link
Contributor Author

/label peer-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR label Dec 19, 2022
@Amrita42
Copy link
Contributor

/label peer-review-in-progress

@Amrita42
Copy link
Contributor

@SNiemann15 please squash the commits into one commit

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR label Dec 19, 2022
@Amrita42
Copy link
Contributor

Suggestion>> Title >> Specific hardware modes are deprecated. Since we mention these h/w models in the description.

@Amrita42
Copy link
Contributor

/remove-label peer-review-in-progress
/remove-label peer-review-needed
/label peer-review-done

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR and removed peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR labels Dec 19, 2022
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 19, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 19, 2022

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

@marrusl
Copy link

marrusl commented Dec 19, 2022

/lgtm

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 19, 2022

@marrusl: changing LGTM is restricted to collaborators

In response to this:

/lgtm

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@SNiemann15
Copy link
Contributor Author

/label merge-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR label Dec 19, 2022
@mburke5678 mburke5678 merged commit afca4eb into openshift:enterprise-4.12 Dec 19, 2022
@mburke5678 mburke5678 removed the merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR label Dec 19, 2022
@SNiemann15 SNiemann15 deleted the deprecation_z13_power8 branch December 20, 2022 08:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees

@manojnkumar manojnkumar

Labels
peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
7 participants
@SNiemann15 @ocpdocs-previewbot @manojnkumar @holgwolf @Amrita42 @marrusl @mburke5678