New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Document GitOps v1.8 RN #55921
Document GitOps v1.8 RN #55921
Conversation
🤖 Updated build preview is available at: Build log: https://circleci.com/gh/ocpdocs-previewbot/openshift-docs/11190 |
Hi @iam-veeramalla @jaideepr97 @varshab1210: PTAL at this PR and provide feedback. Thanks! |
Hi @jaideepr97: PTAL at the revised PR and provide your feedback. Thanks! |
LGTM after we address @varshab1210's point |
@jaideepr97 Thanks for the LGTM. I have a question: I see that GITOPS-2459 is tagged with the Request to help me understand better why we need to link this issue GITOPS-2457 instead. |
LGTM thanks @Srivaralakshmi |
LGTM |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm
@varshab1210 @jaideepr97 @iam-veeramalla @ciiay @rolfedh @deerskindoll : Requesting LGTM from you. Thanks! |
92eb23e
to
5c02044
Compare
Looking at the future timeline for OCP support and our 1.8 release, it looks like we'll need to support OCP 4.10 on that as well. OCP 4.10 will still be supported for a month after 1.7 goes EOL, and we need to have at least one supported version of GitOps on every supported version of OCP. I've updated the component matrix on confluence with this addition, and for your reference here's the spreadsheet where I figure all this out: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1uHORNoJR5nbx8Oa2bwCjOkht7ZvoQ9b2F514UG_Pe5c/edit#gid=114872730 Thanks for your patience with all these changes, I really appreciate your help @Srivaralakshmi! 🙇🏻 |
@iam-veeramalla @harrietgrace @varshab1210 I have added the feature names for multiple resources and Application set Progressive rollout strategy to the OCP GitOps v1.8 RN TP table. Also added the Release note item for the Application set Progressive rollout strategy feature and included OCP 4.10 to the list of OCP versions. PTAL and provide feedback. |
@Srivaralakshmi Thanks for the release notes. A couple of things more need to be added. |
@iam-veeramalla , @reginapizza , @varshab1210 , @harrietgrace: I have added the feature name for the PTAL at the revised PR and provide feedback. |
@iam-veeramalla , @reginapizza , @varshab1210 , @harrietgrace: Removed the must-gather content from RN. Please provide LGTM to confirm and approve this RN and that there are no more incoming changes to the RN PR now. Thanks! |
@reginapizza Incorporated your comments. PTAL and approve. |
Looks good! 👍 |
@varshab1210 , @iam-veeramalla, and @ciiay : Added the Known Issue. PTAL and approve. @harrietgrace As per our discussion the last day, I have made the following changes in the TP table:
PTAL at the revised PR and approve. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
LGTM, Thanks @Srivaralakshmi |
Nice! Looks great, thanks @Srivaralakshmi! |
New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed. |
LGTM |
Fixing nitpick Fixing SME review comments Minor updates Fixing nitpicks Fixing usage Minor edits to language Adding new updates Adding new updates Adding kam to TP table Removing must-gather content from RN Fixing SME comments Fixing nitpick Fixing nitpick Fixing peer-review ocmment Adding Known issue for GITOPS-2736 and TP table modification to add GitOps versions and removing kam CLI out of TP table Fixing SME comments
88c94e2
to
5a72be4
Compare
/cherrypick enterprise-4.10 |
/cherrypick enterprise-4.11 |
/cherrypick enterprise-4.12 |
/cherrypick enterprise-4.13 |
@rolfedh: new pull request created: #57302 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@rolfedh: new pull request created: #57303 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@rolfedh: new pull request created: #57304 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@rolfedh: new pull request created: #57305 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
RHDEVDOCS-4961: GitOps 1.8 release notes
RHDEVDOCS-5030: Update instances of kam to reflect the correct usage
4.10
and later