New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
RHDEVDOCS-4985: Updated the matrix table to fill in identified gaps #56355
Conversation
@shipsing: This pull request references RHDEVDOCS-4958 which is a valid jira issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
🤖 Updated build preview is available at: Build log: https://circleci.com/gh/ocpdocs-previewbot/openshift-docs/10167 |
@shipsing: This pull request references RHDEVDOCS-4958 which is a valid jira issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@shipsing: This pull request references RHDEVDOCS-4958 which is a valid jira issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@savitaashture @concaf @koustavsaha @RickJWagner @VeereshAradhya, Could you please review this PR and share your feedback? Thanks |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The pipelines 1.9 entry in the matrix table shows the PAC value as 0.15.x (GA), but the page here: http://dashboard.apps.cicd.ospqa.com/releases/componentmatrix/ suggests the PAC value is 0.14.x (GA). So, the published RN and the matrix page need to be consistent. I guess we might need to update either of the two.
Also, Pipelines 1.8 is supported in OCP 4.10. So, manually cherrypicked Pipelines 1.8 RN to OCP 4.10.
742f58e
to
5425874
Compare
@shipsing: This pull request references RHDEVDOCS-4985 which is a valid jira issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/label px-approved Looks good. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
@shipsing: This pull request references RHDEVDOCS-4985 which is a valid jira issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/LGTM |
@shipsing: This pull request references RHDEVDOCS-4985 which is a valid jira issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed. |
@koustavsaha please review and approve the PR. Thanks |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ack
/cherry-pick enterprise-4.13 |
/cherry-pick enterprise-4.12 |
/cherry-pick enterprise-4.11 |
/cherry-pick enterprise-4.10 |
/cherry-pick enterprise-4.9 |
@gabriel-rh: new pull request created: #56815 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@gabriel-rh: new pull request created: #56816 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@gabriel-rh: new pull request created: #56817 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@gabriel-rh: #56355 failed to apply on top of branch "enterprise-4.10":
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@gabriel-rh: #56355 failed to apply on top of branch "enterprise-4.9":
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Aligned team: Dev Tools
Purpose: To resolve the following issues:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHDEVDOCS-4985
OCP version this PR applies to: enterprise 4.9 and later
Link to docs preview: https://56355--docspreview.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/cicd/pipelines/op-release-notes.html#compatibility-support-matrix_op-release-notes
Change Management
Need an ACK from Eng: @savitaashture @concaf
Need an ACK from PM: @koustavsaha
Need an ACK from Product experience: @RickJWagner
Need an ACK from QE: @VeereshAradhya
Need an ACK from DPM: @pmkovar
Need an ACK from CS: @Preeticp