Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OBSDOCS-152: Removing duplicated uninstall content #67289

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Nov 2, 2023

Conversation

abrennan89
Copy link
Contributor

@abrennan89 abrennan89 commented Nov 2, 2023

Version(s):
4.11+

Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OBSDOCS-152

Link to docs preview:
https://67289--docspreview.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/logging/cluster-logging-uninstall#olm-deleting-operators-from-a-cluster-using-web-console_cluster-logging-uninstall

QE review:
Not required, just removing content from duplicated sections. Modules still appears untouched in docs.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Nov 2, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 2, 2023

@abrennan89: This pull request references OBSDOCS-152 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the epic to target the "4.15.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.11+

Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OBSDOCS-152

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Nov 2, 2023
@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 2, 2023

@abrennan89: This pull request references OBSDOCS-152 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the epic to target the "4.15.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.11+

Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OBSDOCS-152

Link to docs preview:

QE review:
Not required, just removing content from duplicated sections. Module still appears untouched in docs.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 2, 2023

@abrennan89: This pull request references OBSDOCS-152 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the epic to target the "4.15.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.11+

Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OBSDOCS-152

Link to docs preview:
https://67289--docspreview.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/logging/cluster-logging-uninstall#olm-deleting-operators-from-a-cluster-using-web-console_cluster-logging-uninstall

QE review:
Not required, just removing content from duplicated sections. Modules still appears untouched in docs.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@abrennan89 abrennan89 added peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR dev-tools Label for all Odo/Pipelines/Helm/Developer Console/Perspective PRs branch/enterprise-4.11 branch/enterprise-4.12 branch/enterprise-4.13 branch/enterprise-4.14 branch/enterprise-4.15 labels Nov 2, 2023
@abrennan89 abrennan89 added this to the Continuous Release milestone Nov 2, 2023
@kelbrown20 kelbrown20 added the peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR label Nov 2, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@kelbrown20 kelbrown20 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Updates LGTM!

@kelbrown20 kelbrown20 added peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR and removed peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR labels Nov 2, 2023
@abrennan89 abrennan89 merged commit 7d38dd0 into openshift:main Nov 2, 2023
1 check passed
@abrennan89
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cherrypick enterprise-4.11

@abrennan89
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cherrypick enterprise-4.12

@abrennan89
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cherrypick enterprise-4.13

@abrennan89
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cherrypick enterprise-4.14

@abrennan89
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cherrypick enterprise-4.15

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@abrennan89: #67289 failed to apply on top of branch "enterprise-4.11":

Applying: OBSDOCS-152: Removing duplicated uninstall content
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
M	logging/cluster-logging-uninstall.adoc
Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
Auto-merging logging/cluster-logging-uninstall.adoc
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in logging/cluster-logging-uninstall.adoc
error: Failed to merge in the changes.
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch=diff' to see the failed patch
Patch failed at 0001 OBSDOCS-152: Removing duplicated uninstall content
When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.11

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@abrennan89: new pull request created: #67304

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.12

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@abrennan89: new pull request created: #67305

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.13

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@abrennan89: new pull request created: #67306

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.14

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@abrennan89: new pull request created: #67307

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.15

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
branch/enterprise-4.11 branch/enterprise-4.12 branch/enterprise-4.13 branch/enterprise-4.14 branch/enterprise-4.15 dev-tools Label for all Odo/Pipelines/Helm/Developer Console/Perspective PRs jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants