New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
OBSDOCS-152: Restructuring log visualization docs #67346
Conversation
@abrennan89: This pull request references OBSDOCS-152 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the epic to target the "4.15.0" version, but no target version was set. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
🤖 Updated build preview is available at: Build log: https://circleci.com/gh/ocpdocs-previewbot/openshift-docs/31991 |
dd414a2
to
55eee92
Compare
@abrennan89: This pull request references OBSDOCS-152 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the epic to target the "4.15.0" version, but no target version was set. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
2fb1389
to
50331fe
Compare
FYI @Preeticp updates will be required to https://docs.openshift.com/pipelines/1.12/records/viewing-pipeline-logs-using-the-openshift-logging-operator.html to keep the links up to date with our new structure for logging docs. In fact, that section as a whole should be updated to move away from using the old EFK stack to using the new Vector/Loki stack. |
b8e3cc8
to
bed48ca
Compare
@abrennan89: This pull request references OBSDOCS-152 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the epic to target the "4.15.0" version, but no target version was set. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@abrennan89: This pull request references OBSDOCS-152 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the epic to target the "4.15.0" version, but no target version was set. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
c87ff9c
to
1fe42c3
Compare
@abrennan89 I don't see a sub-items which display lokistack logs via Admin/Dev Console under https://67346--docspreview.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/logging/log_visualization/log-visualization. Is there another PR about lokistack visualization? |
@anpingli this PR is just restructuring existing content. I didn't see any content for Lokistack visualization to move here. |
LGTM |
@abrennan89: This pull request references OBSDOCS-152 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the epic to target the "4.15.0" version, but no target version was set. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Otherwise, LGTM!
59afef6
to
900a5e2
Compare
900a5e2
to
bf1b58d
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Approving 👍
/cherrypick enterprise-4.11 |
/cherrypick enterprise-4.12 |
/cherrypick enterprise-4.13 |
/cherrypick enterprise-4.14 |
/cherrypick enterprise-4.15 |
@abrennan89: #67346 failed to apply on top of branch "enterprise-4.11":
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@abrennan89: #67346 failed to apply on top of branch "enterprise-4.12":
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@abrennan89: #67346 failed to apply on top of branch "enterprise-4.13":
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@abrennan89: new pull request created: #67510 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@abrennan89: new pull request created: #67511 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Version(s):
4.11+
Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OBSDOCS-152
Link to docs preview:
QE review: