New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
OSDOCS-8253: Improved LokiStack integration #67836
Conversation
@skrthomas: This pull request references OSDOCS-8253 which is a valid jira issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
🤖 Updated build preview is available at: Build log: https://circleci.com/gh/ocpdocs-previewbot/openshift-docs/37314 |
9300ad5
to
030d666
Compare
@skrthomas: This pull request references OSDOCS-8253 which is a valid jira issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@skrthomas: This pull request references OSDOCS-8253 which is a valid jira issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@skrthomas: This pull request references OSDOCS-8253 which is a valid jira issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
030d666
to
8d70c3c
Compare
@nathan-weinberg @jpinsonneau @acmenezes Here's my draft PR for Improved LokiStack configuration. Please let me know your feedback. I think I've got all the doc impacts from this jira, but let me know if I'm missing anything. |
8d70c3c
to
1edf54d
Compare
@skrthomas: This pull request references OSDOCS-8253 which is a valid jira issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@skrthomas: This pull request references OSDOCS-8253 which is a valid jira issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
a059873
to
c3b98e7
Compare
@skrthomas: This pull request references OSDOCS-8253 which is a valid jira issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
c3b98e7
to
8a90025
Compare
8a90025
to
9594a97
Compare
@jpinsonneau I updated the fields to Advanced. Here's the links to the lines in the files: |
@skrthomas Can you squash the commits? |
@mburke5678 Yep, sure can. Sorry about that.I didn't realize there were 2 commits here. Must've happened when I rebased and I didn't realize it. |
OSDOCS-8253: API version updates
9594a97
to
4c0dec3
Compare
For peer review/merge review:
Merge to only the
no-1.5
branch - no cherrypicks are required.This PR is part of an experiment for simplifying merges for asynchronous content, and I will open one PR against main to incorporate all of the Network Observability 1.5 content just before its GA.
Version(s):
4.11+
Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSDOCS-8253
Link to docs preview:
API Version updates:
Loki Installation step simplification
IncludeList
Network Observability metrics dashboards add includeList
Unrelated updates
Packet Drop and DNS Overview nesting adjustment
QE review:
Additional information: