Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OADP-3258 [DOCS] Fixing error in format #69328

Merged

Conversation

anarnold97
Copy link
Contributor

@anarnold97 anarnold97 commented Dec 13, 2023

Jira

Missed spacing in /backup_and_restore/index.html#backing-up-and-restoring-applications

See *Creating a Backup CR*.You can configure the following backup options:

Version(s):

  • OCP 4.11 → branch/enterprise-4.11
  • OCP 4.12 → branch/enterprise-4.12
  • OCP 4.13 → branch/enterprise-4.13
  • OCP 4.14 → branch/enterprise-4.14
  • OCP 4.15 → branch/enterprise-4.15

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • [0] QE has approved this change. - not required formatting fix

Signed-off-by: Andy Arnold <anarnold@redhat.com>
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Dec 13, 2023
@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link

🤖 Wed Dec 13 14:07:43 - Prow CI generated the docs preview: https://69328--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 13, 2023

@anarnold97: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@anarnold97
Copy link
Contributor Author

/label oadp

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the OADP Label for all OADP PRs label Dec 13, 2023
@anarnold97
Copy link
Contributor Author

anarnold97 commented Dec 13, 2023

@sara thomas - i was checking the cherrypick for 4.11, the link works but I noticed another problem with a missed space

@anarnold97
Copy link
Contributor Author

/label peer-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR label Dec 13, 2023
@lahinson lahinson added peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR and removed peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR labels Dec 13, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@lahinson lahinson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@lahinson lahinson added peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR and removed peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR labels Dec 13, 2023
@anarnold97
Copy link
Contributor Author

/label merge-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR label Dec 13, 2023
@kcarmichael08 kcarmichael08 added merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR branch/enterprise-4.11 branch/enterprise-4.12 branch/enterprise-4.13 branch/enterprise-4.14 branch/enterprise-4.15 and removed merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR labels Dec 13, 2023
@kcarmichael08 kcarmichael08 added this to the Continuous Release milestone Dec 13, 2023
@kcarmichael08 kcarmichael08 merged commit 23e7311 into openshift:main Dec 13, 2023
3 checks passed
@kcarmichael08
Copy link
Contributor

/cherrypick enterprise-4.11

@kcarmichael08
Copy link
Contributor

/cherrypick enterprise-4.12

@kcarmichael08
Copy link
Contributor

/cherrypick enterprise-4.13

@kcarmichael08
Copy link
Contributor

/cherrypick enterprise-4.14

@kcarmichael08
Copy link
Contributor

/cherrypick enterprise-4.15

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@kcarmichael08: new pull request created: #69355

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.11

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@kcarmichael08: new pull request created: #69356

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.12

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@kcarmichael08: new pull request created: #69357

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.13

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@kcarmichael08: new pull request created: #69358

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.14

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@kcarmichael08: new pull request created: #69359

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.15

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@kcarmichael08 kcarmichael08 removed the merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR label Dec 13, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
branch/enterprise-4.11 branch/enterprise-4.12 branch/enterprise-4.13 branch/enterprise-4.14 branch/enterprise-4.15 OADP Label for all OADP PRs peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants