Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OADP-3184 cherrypicked to OCP 4.12 #70712

Merged

Conversation

sbeskin-redhat
Copy link
Contributor

Resolves: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OADP-3184
OADP-1.3
OCP-4.12

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jan 24, 2024
@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link

ocpdocs-previewbot commented Jan 24, 2024

🤖 Thu Jan 25 13:45:00 - Prow CI generated the docs preview: https://70712--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app

@sbeskin-redhat
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@sbeskin-redhat sbeskin-redhat changed the title MTA-3184 to OCP 4.12 MTA-3184 cherrypicked to OCP 4.12 Jan 24, 2024
@sbeskin-redhat
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

3 similar comments
@sbeskin-redhat
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@sbeskin-redhat
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@sbeskin-redhat
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@sbeskin-redhat sbeskin-redhat changed the title MTA-3184 cherrypicked to OCP 4.12 OADP-3184 cherrypicked to OCP 4.12 Jan 25, 2024
@sbeskin-redhat
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@@ -40,6 +39,7 @@ You can schedule backups by creating a `Schedule` CR instead of a `Backup` CR. S

This issue has been resolved in the OADP 1.1.6 and OADP 1.2.2 releases, therefore it is recommended that users upgrade to these releases.

For more information, see xref:../../../backup_and_restore/application_backup_and_restore/troubleshooting.adoc#oadp-restic-restore-failing-psa-policy_oadp-troubleshooting[Restic restore partially failing on OCP 4.14 due to changed PSA policy].
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you double check this xref. I think it is not correct.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@aireilly
Yes, that xref was indeed broken, thank you! I replaced it with a link and ran the check again. The check failed two times and then passed. I suspect that the previous failures weren't caused by the broken link but rather by some flakiness of the checks.
Thank you for your help!

@aireilly
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

3 similar comments
@aireilly
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

@sbeskin-redhat
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@sbeskin-redhat
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 25, 2024

@sbeskin-redhat: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@EricPonvelle EricPonvelle merged commit ada27cc into openshift:enterprise-4.12 Jan 25, 2024
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
branch/enterprise-4.12 size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants