Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Logging 5.7.11 Release Notes #71233

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Feb 9, 2024
Merged

Logging 5.7.11 Release Notes #71233

merged 1 commit into from Feb 9, 2024

Conversation

libander
Copy link
Contributor

@libander libander commented Feb 6, 2024 •
edited

Version(s): 4.14, 4.13, 4.12

Issue: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OBSDOCS-777

Link to docs preview:

QE review: @anpingli / @QiaolingTang / @kabirbhartiRH

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:
SME Review: @jcantrill / @xperimental / @alanconway / @periklis

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Feb 6, 2024
@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link

ocpdocs-previewbot commented Feb 6, 2024 •
edited

🤖 Thu Feb 08 21:20:41 - Prow CI generated the docs preview: https://71233--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app

@kabirbhartiRH
Copy link

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 6, 2024
periklis
periklis approved these changes Feb 7, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link

@periklis periklis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@kabirbhartiRH
Copy link

kabirbhartiRH commented Feb 7, 2024 •
edited

@libander Could you please add CVE-2023-39326 under the CVE list. It got added on the errata after ProdSec approval

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 7, 2024
@openshift-ci OpenShift CI
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 7, 2024

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

@libander
Copy link
Contributor Author

libander commented Feb 7, 2024

/label peer-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR label Feb 7, 2024
@adellape adellape self-assigned this Feb 7, 2024
@adellape adellape added the peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR label Feb 7, 2024
adellape
adellape reviewed Feb 7, 2024
View reviewed changes
modules/logging-release-notes-5-7-11.adoc Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
modules/logging-release-notes-5-7-11.adoc Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@adellape adellape added peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR branch/enterprise-4.12 branch/enterprise-4.13 branch/enterprise-4.14 and removed peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR labels Feb 7, 2024
@adellape
Copy link
Contributor

adellape commented Feb 7, 2024

Version(s): 4.14, 4.13, 4.12

Should these be going to 4.15 too for future-proofing, or not yet? Looks like the 4.15 preview is currently a few z-streams behind: https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.15/logging/logging_release_notes/logging-5-7-release-notes.html

@adellape adellape added this to the Continuous Release milestone Feb 7, 2024
@libander
Copy link
Contributor Author

libander commented Feb 8, 2024

/label merge-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR label Feb 8, 2024
@openshift-ci OpenShift CI
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 8, 2024

@libander: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@kalexand-rh
Copy link
Contributor

@libander, please answer Alex's question about 4.15.

@adellape adellape added the merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR label Feb 9, 2024
@libander
Copy link
Contributor Author

libander commented Feb 9, 2024

Version(s): 4.14, 4.13, 4.12

Should these be going to 4.15 too for future-proofing, or not yet? Looks like the 4.15 preview is currently a few z-streams behind: https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.15/logging/logging_release_notes/logging-5-7-release-notes.html

Version(s): 4.14, 4.13, 4.12 is correct.

@adellape adellape merged commit 8e9257f into openshift:enterprise-4.14 Feb 9, 2024
2 checks passed
@adellape
Copy link
Contributor

adellape commented Feb 9, 2024

/cherrypick enterprise-4.13

@adellape
Copy link
Contributor

adellape commented Feb 9, 2024

/cherrypick enterprise-4.12

@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link

@adellape: new pull request created: #71460

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.13

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot openshift-cherrypick-robot mentioned this pull request Feb 9, 2024
Merged
@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link

@adellape: new pull request created: #71461

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.12

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot openshift-cherrypick-robot mentioned this pull request Feb 9, 2024
Merged
@adellape adellape removed merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR labels Feb 9, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@adellape adellape adellape left review comments

@periklis periklis periklis approved these changes

Assignees

@adellape adellape

@kabirbhartiRH kabirbhartiRH

Labels
branch/enterprise-4.12 branch/enterprise-4.13 branch/enterprise-4.14 peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Continuous Release
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
7 participants
@libander @ocpdocs-previewbot @kabirbhartiRH @adellape @kalexand-rh @openshift-cherrypick-robot @periklis