Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

OCPBUGS-29085: added shiftstack known issue to 4.15 release notes #71509

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 13, 2024
Merged

OCPBUGS-29085: added shiftstack known issue to 4.15 release notes #71509

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 13, 2024

Conversation

sheriff-rh
Copy link
Contributor

@sheriff-rh sheriff-rh commented Feb 12, 2024 •
edited

Version(s):
4.15

Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-29085

Link to docs preview (VPN required):
Known Issues (fourth one down)

@sheriff-rh sheriff-rh added this to the Planned for 4.15 GA milestone Feb 12, 2024
@sheriff-rh sheriff-rh self-assigned this Feb 12, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/severity-moderate Referenced Jira bug's severity is moderate for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Feb 12, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@sheriff-rh: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-29085, which is invalid:

  • expected Jira Issue OCPBUGS-29085 to depend on a bug in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but no dependents were found

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.15

Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-29085

Link to docs preview:
Known Issues (fourth one down)

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Feb 12, 2024
@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link

ocpdocs-previewbot commented Feb 12, 2024 •
edited

🤖 Tue Feb 13 13:17:47 - Prow CI generated the docs preview: https://71509--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app

dulek
dulek reviewed Feb 13, 2024
View reviewed changes
release_notes/ocp-4-15-release-notes.adoc Outdated
@@ -1619,6 +1619,8 @@ In the following tables, features are marked with the following statuses:

* When running a cluster with FIPS enabled, you might receive the following error when running an older version of the OpenShift CLI (`oc`) on a {op-system-base} 9 system: `FIPS mode is enabled, but the required OpenSSL backend is unavailable`. As a workaround, use the `oc` binary provided with the {product-title} cluster. (link:https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-23386[*OCPBUGS-23386*])

* In {rh-openstack-first} on {product-version} environments, `IngressController` objects configured with `endpointPublishingStrategy.type: LoadBalancerService` will fail to configure IPv6 correctly. (link:https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2263550[*BZ#2263550*], link:https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2263552[*BZ#2263552*])
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's not that it will not configure IPv6 correctly. It will fail on IPv6-first deployments.

Also it's the other way around - OpenShift runs on top of OpenStack. How about:

In {product-version} with IPv6 networking running on {rh-openstack-first} environments, `IngressController` objects configured with `endpointPublishingStrategy.type=LoadBalancerService` will not function correctly. (link:https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2263550[*BZ#2263550*], link:https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2263552[*BZ#2263552*])

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! I copied it word for word to the release notes 👍

@sheriff-rh sheriff-rh added the peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR label Feb 13, 2024
@JoeAldinger JoeAldinger added peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR and removed peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR labels Feb 13, 2024
JoeAldinger
JoeAldinger reviewed Feb 13, 2024
View reviewed changes
release_notes/ocp-4-15-release-notes.adoc Outdated
@@ -1694,6 +1694,8 @@ In the following tables, features are marked with the following statuses:

* When running a cluster with FIPS enabled, you might receive the following error when running an older version of the OpenShift CLI (`oc`) on a {op-system-base} 9 system: `FIPS mode is enabled, but the required OpenSSL backend is unavailable`. As a workaround, use the `oc` binary provided with the {product-title} cluster. (link:https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-23386[*OCPBUGS-23386*])

* In {product-version} with IPv6 networking running on {rh-openstack-first} environments, `IngressController` objects configured with `endpointPublishingStrategy.type=LoadBalancerService` will not function correctly. (link:https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2263550[*BZ#2263550*], link:https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2263552[*BZ#2263552*])
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good. I couldn't figure on how to get a noun after endpoint.... I think we are ok though because you have objects configured with. The only thing you could do is maybe say endpoint... YAML configuration or maybe install configuration or deployment config.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That's great, thanks. I couldn't come up with a solution either! I'll make the change.

JoeAldinger
JoeAldinger reviewed Feb 13, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@JoeAldinger JoeAldinger left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

question/suggestion

@JoeAldinger JoeAldinger added peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR and removed peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR labels Feb 13, 2024
@sheriff-rh
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@openshift-ci OpenShift CI
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 13, 2024

@sheriff-rh: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@sheriff-rh
Copy link
Contributor Author

Merging.

@sheriff-rh sheriff-rh merged commit cafc9e1 into openshift:enterprise-4.15 Feb 13, 2024
2 checks passed
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@sheriff-rh: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-29085: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-29085 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.15

Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-29085

Link to docs preview (VPN required):
Known Issues (fourth one down)

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@dulek dulek dulek left review comments

@JoeAldinger JoeAldinger JoeAldinger left review comments

Assignees

@sheriff-rh sheriff-rh

Labels
branch/enterprise-4.15 jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/severity-moderate Referenced Jira bug's severity is moderate for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
OCP 4.15 GA
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
5 participants
@sheriff-rh @openshift-ci-robot @ocpdocs-previewbot @dulek @JoeAldinger