OBSDOCS-72: Document that when metrics data retention time is set to …

[eromanova97]

Version(s): enterprise-4.12 and later

Issue: OBSDOCS-72

Link to docs preview: Modifying the retention time and size for Prometheus metrics data

QE review:

• QE has approved this change.

Peer review:

• Peer review done

Additional information:

[openshift-ci-robot]

@eromanova97: This pull request references OBSDOCS-72 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.16.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Version(s): enterprise-4.13 and later

Issue: OBSDOCS-72

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

• QE has approved this change.

Peer review:

• Peer review done

Additional information:
After the merge, I will also cherrypick this to enterprise-4.12 manually. The reason is because the retention time is set to 15 days by default in 4.12, not 11 days.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[ocpdocs-previewbot]

🤖 Fri Mar 08 10:17:55 - Prow CI generated the docs preview:
https://72782--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app

[openshift-ci-robot]

@eromanova97: This pull request references OBSDOCS-72 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.16.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Version(s): enterprise-4.13 and later

Issue: OBSDOCS-72

Link to docs preview: Modifying the retention time and size for Prometheus metrics data

QE review:

• QE has approved this change.

Peer review:

• Peer review done

Additional information:
After the merge, I will also cherrypick this to enterprise-4.12 manually. The reason is because the retention time is set to 15 days by default in 4.12, not 11 days.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@eromanova97: This pull request references OBSDOCS-72 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.16.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Version(s): enterprise-4.12 and later

Issue: OBSDOCS-72

Link to docs preview: Modifying the retention time and size for Prometheus metrics data

QE review:

• QE has approved this change.

Peer review:

• Peer review done

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[simonpasquier]

/lgtm

[juzhao]

/lgtm

[openshift-ci-robot]

@eromanova97: This pull request references OBSDOCS-72 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.16.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Version(s): enterprise-4.12 and later

Issue: OBSDOCS-72

Link to docs preview: Modifying the retention time and size for Prometheus metrics data

QE review:

• QE has approved this change.

Peer review:

• Peer review done

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[eromanova97]

/label peer-review-needed

[dfitzmau]

/remove-label peer-review-needed

/label peer-review-in-progress

[dfitzmau]

Hi @eromanova97 .

Nice work. I added some minor comment inline.

[dfitzmau]

/remove-label peer-review-in-progress

/label peer-review-done

[openshift-ci]

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@eromanova97: This pull request references OBSDOCS-72 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.16.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Version(s): enterprise-4.12 and later

Issue: OBSDOCS-72

Link to docs preview: Modifying the retention time and size for Prometheus metrics data

QE review:

• QE has approved this change.

Peer review:

• Peer review done

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[openshift-ci]

@eromanova97: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[eromanova97]

/label merge-review-needed

[mburke5678]

/cherrypick enterprise-4.12

[mburke5678]

/cherrypick enterprise-4.13

[mburke5678]

/cherrypick enterprise-4.14

[mburke5678]

/cherrypick enterprise-4.15

[mburke5678]

/cherrypick enterprise-4.16

[openshift-cherrypick-robot]

@mburke5678: #72782 failed to apply on top of branch "enterprise-4.12":

Applying: OBSDOCS-72: Document that when metrics data retention time is set to 0, the default values apply
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
M	modules/monitoring-modifying-retention-time-and-size-for-prometheus-metrics-data.adoc
Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
Auto-merging modules/monitoring-modifying-retention-time-and-size-for-prometheus-metrics-data.adoc
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in modules/monitoring-modifying-retention-time-and-size-for-prometheus-metrics-data.adoc
error: Failed to merge in the changes.
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch=diff' to see the failed patch
Patch failed at 0001 OBSDOCS-72: Document that when metrics data retention time is set to 0, the default values apply
When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.12

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-cherrypick-robot]

@mburke5678: new pull request created: #72879

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.13

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-cherrypick-robot]

@mburke5678: new pull request created: #72880

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.14

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-cherrypick-robot]

@mburke5678: new pull request created: #72881

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.15

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-cherrypick-robot]

@mburke5678: new pull request created: #72882

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.16

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.