OBSDOCS-972: Logging- Remove confusing support statement for splunk fields deprecation #74643
Conversation
openshift-ci-robot
added
the
jira/valid-reference
|
@shreyasiddhartha: This pull request references OBSDOCS-972 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the task to target the "4.16.0" version, but no target version was set. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
openshift-ci
bot
added
the
size/XS
|
@shreyasiddhartha: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
@shreyasiddhartha: This pull request references OBSDOCS-972 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the task to target the "4.16.0" version, but no target version was set. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
@shreyasiddhartha: This pull request references OBSDOCS-972 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the task to target the "4.16.0" version, but no target version was set. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/lgtm |
|
@shreyasiddhartha: This pull request references OBSDOCS-972 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the task to target the "4.16.0" version, but no target version was set. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/label peer-review-needed |
openshift-ci
bot
added
the
peer-review-needed
|
/label peer-review-in-progress |
|
/remove-label peer-review-needed |
openshift-ci
bot
added
peer-review-in-progress
|
/label peer-review-done |
openshift-ci
bot
added
the
peer-review-done
|
/remove-label peer-review-in-progress |
openshift-ci
bot
removed
the
peer-review-in-progress
|
/label merge-review-needed |
openshift-ci
bot
added
the
merge-review-needed
|
@shreyasiddhartha: This pull request references OBSDOCS-972 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the task to target the "4.16.0" version, but no target version was set. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
@shreyasiddhartha I don't see a Change Management email on this one, but it seems like it's a category that needs one, even if the "inform" special type. Please check with your DPM and the OpenShift docs manual. |
|
/remove-label merge-review-needed |
|
/cherrypick enterprise-4.16 |
openshift-ci
bot
removed
the
merge-review-needed
|
/cherrypick enterprise-4.15 |
|
/cherrypick enterprise-4.14 |
|
/cherrypick enterprise-4.13 |
|
@ShaunaDiaz: new pull request created: #74730 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
@ShaunaDiaz: new pull request created: #74731 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
@ShaunaDiaz: new pull request created: #74732 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
@ShaunaDiaz: new pull request created: #74733 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Change type: Doc update; Logging- Remove confusing support statement for splunk fields deprecation
Doc JIRA: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OBSDOCS-972
Fix Version: 4.13+
Doc Preview: https://74643--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-dedicated/latest/logging/logging_release_notes/logging-5-9-release-notes.html#logging-release-notes-5-9-0-deprecation-notice
SME Review: @jcantrill
QE Review: @kabirbhartiRH
Peer Review: @bhardesty