Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[CMP-2336]Compliance Operator 1.4.1 Bugs #74715

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 19, 2024

Conversation

GroceryBoyJr
Copy link
Contributor

@GroceryBoyJr GroceryBoyJr commented Apr 16, 2024

Version(s): Branched from main but goes to 4.12+. Compliance Operator updates apply to all supported OCP branches.

Issue: Compliance Operator 1.4.1 update release notes https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CMP-2336

Link to docs preview: https://74715--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/security/compliance_operator/compliance-operator-release-notes.html

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Apr 16, 2024
@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link

ocpdocs-previewbot commented Apr 16, 2024

@GroceryBoyJr
Copy link
Contributor Author

@rhmdnd @yuumasato @Vincent056 your SME review desired.

@GroceryBoyJr
Copy link
Contributor Author

@xiaojiey @BhargaviGudi your QE review desired please.

@GroceryBoyJr GroceryBoyJr force-pushed the cmp-2336 branch 3 times, most recently from 607ad56 to c5b4005 Compare April 17, 2024 14:50
@GroceryBoyJr
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

1 similar comment
@GroceryBoyJr
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@GroceryBoyJr
Copy link
Contributor Author

/label peer-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR label Apr 17, 2024
@rh-tokeefe
Copy link
Contributor

/label peer-review-in-progress

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR label Apr 17, 2024
@rh-tokeefe
Copy link
Contributor

@GroceryBoyJr overall this looks pretty good to me.

I have some fairly minor style suggestions in a few places. You did a very good job writing the bug fixes so they all have the same structure. In a few places, I think changing the language to past tense helps more clearly present the previous behavior versus the new behavior.

Apart from that, it looks like the QA and SME review are still required before the PR can continue on in the official review process. I am still being onboarded for the peer review process, so I will also ask @bburt-rh to give this a quick looks as well.

Copy link
Contributor

@bburt-rh bburt-rh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Made a few extra edits.

Also, @rh-tokeefe - a SME review is not required -- only QE approval. It's the writer's call whether or not to have a SME review the PR.

@GroceryBoyJr
Copy link
Contributor Author

/remove-label peer-review-in-progress
/remove-label peer-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR labels Apr 17, 2024
@ShaunaDiaz
Copy link
Contributor

@GroceryBoyJr Made some nit comments for your consideration. I haven't merged because the advisory doesn't appear to be Shipped Live yet and I didn't want to break your embargo. Please let me know when ready to merge. TY!

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 19, 2024
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 19, 2024

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 19, 2024

@GroceryBoyJr: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@ShaunaDiaz
Copy link
Contributor

/remove-label merge-review-in-progress

@ShaunaDiaz ShaunaDiaz merged commit 0002700 into openshift:main Apr 19, 2024
3 checks passed
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR label Apr 19, 2024
@ShaunaDiaz
Copy link
Contributor

/cherrypick enterprise-4.12

@ShaunaDiaz
Copy link
Contributor

/cherrypick enterprise-4.13

@ShaunaDiaz
Copy link
Contributor

/cherrypick enterprise-4.14

@ShaunaDiaz
Copy link
Contributor

/cherrypick enterprise-4.15

@ShaunaDiaz
Copy link
Contributor

/cherrypick enterprise-4.16

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@ShaunaDiaz: new pull request created: #74879

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.12

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@ShaunaDiaz: new pull request created: #74880

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.13

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@ShaunaDiaz: new pull request created: #74881

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.14

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@ShaunaDiaz: new pull request created: #74882

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.15

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@ShaunaDiaz: new pull request created: #74883

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.16

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

9 participants