New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
switch integration tests to external kubeclient #22382
switch integration tests to external kubeclient #22382
Conversation
afd9803
to
54de9bc
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
One question/nit.
/lgtm
@@ -689,21 +689,3 @@ func assertEnvVarEquals(name string, value string, deployment *kapi.ReplicationC | |||
|
|||
t.Fatalf("Expected env var with name %s and value %s", name, value) | |||
} | |||
|
|||
func makeStream(name, tag, dir, image string) *imageapi.ImageStream { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Die 😈
if err != nil || len(sa.Secrets) == 0 { | ||
return false, nil | ||
} | ||
return true, nil | ||
}) | ||
if err != nil { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good catch 👍
if err != nil { | ||
return false, err | ||
} | ||
for i := range allSecrets.Items { | ||
secret := &allSecrets.Items[i] | ||
secretv1 := &corev1.Secret{} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yesssss 😈
@@ -0,0 +1,244 @@ | |||
/* |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't see any reasons we would not want to have that on our end and not an upstream, but I might be missing some greater picture you have.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't see any reasons we would not want to have that on our end and not an upstream, but I might be missing some greater picture you have.
it comes in with the rebase. This just makes workable early
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you add that to the list of followups so we don't forget about it?
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: deads2k, soltysh The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/retest |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
3 similar comments
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
No description provided.