Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 1806698: Limit-based eviction should report metrics #24595

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Feb 26, 2020

Conversation

smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor

Limit-based eviction has the same outcome as a capacity-based eviction
but was not being reported to the kubelet_evictions metric, which makes
it harder to alert on. Report those evictions to the metric with
appropriate signals.

Limit-based eviction has the same outcome as a capacity-based eviction
but was not being reported to the kubelet_evictions metric, which makes
it harder to alert on. Report those evictions to the metric with
appropriate signals.
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Feb 24, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the vendor-update Touching vendor dir or related files label Feb 24, 2020
@smarterclayton smarterclayton changed the title UPSTREAM: 87906: Limit-based eviction should report metrics Bug 1806698: Limit-based eviction should report metrics Feb 24, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Feb 24, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@smarterclayton: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1806698, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

Bug 1806698: Limit-based eviction should report metrics

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cherry-pick release-4.4

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@smarterclayton: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-4.4 in a new PR and assign it to you.

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.4

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor Author

4.4 is bug 1806699

@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor Author

/assign @rphillips

@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-aws-serial

@rphillips
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 25, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: rphillips, smarterclayton

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@rphillips
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-aws-serial

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

7 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 3c26fad into openshift:master Feb 26, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@smarterclayton: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged. Bugzilla bug 1806698 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1806698: Limit-based eviction should report metrics

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@smarterclayton: new pull request created: #24603

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.4

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. vendor-update Touching vendor dir or related files
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants