Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

UPSTREAM: 89592: e2e/network: get previous pod errors on NetworkPolicy test failure #24799

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Apr 1, 2020

Conversation

dcbw
Copy link
Contributor

@dcbw dcbw commented Mar 30, 2020

Sometimes the pod has already been cleaned up by the time the test
tried to grab the logs.

Mar 27 16:19:38.066: INFO: Waiting for client-a-jt4tf to complete.
Mar 27 16:19:38.066: INFO: Waiting up to 5m0s for pod "client-a-jt4tf" in namespace "e2e-network-policy-c-9007" to be "success or failure"
Mar 27 16:19:38.072: INFO: Pod "client-a-jt4tf": Phase="Pending", Reason="", readiness=false. Elapsed: 6.270302ms
Mar 27 16:19:40.078: INFO: Pod "client-a-jt4tf": Phase="Pending", Reason="", readiness=false. Elapsed: 2.01233019s
Mar 27 16:19:42.086: INFO: Pod "client-a-jt4tf": Phase="Succeeded", Reason="", readiness=false. Elapsed: 4.020186873s
STEP: Saw pod success
Mar 27 16:19:42.086: INFO: Pod "client-a-jt4tf" satisfied condition "success or failure"
Mar 27 16:19:42.093: FAIL: Error getting container logs: the server could not find the requested resource (get pods client-a-jt4tf)

Full Stack Trace
github.com/openshift/origin/vendor/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/network.checkNoConnectivity(0xc00104adc0, 0xc0016b82c0, 0xc001666400, 0xc000c32000)
	/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/_output/local/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/vendor/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/network/network_policy.go:1457 +0x2a0
github.com/openshift/origin/vendor/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/network.testCannotConnect(0xc00104adc0, 0xc0016b82c0, 0x55587e9, 0x8, 0xc000c32000, 0x50)
	/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/_output/local/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/vendor/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/network/network_policy.go:1406 +0x1fc
github.com/openshift/origin/vendor/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/network.glob..func13.2.7()
	/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/_output/local/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/vendor/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/network/network_policy.go:285 +0x883
github.com/openshift/origin/pkg/test/ginkgo.(*TestOptions).Run(0xc001e47830, 0xc001e50b70, 0x1, 0x1, 0x0, 0x0)
	/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/_output/local/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/pkg/test/ginkgo/cmd_runtest.go:59 +0x41f
main.newRunTestCommand.func1(0xc00121b900, 0xc001e50b70, 0x1, 0x1, 0x0, 0x0)
	/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/_output/local/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/cmd/openshift-tests/openshift-tests.go:238 +0x15d
github.com/openshift/origin/vendor/github.com/spf13/cobra.(*Command).execute(0xc00121b900, 0xc001e50b30, 0x1, 0x1, 0xc00121b900, 0xc001e50b30)
	/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/_output/local/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/vendor/github.com/spf13/cobra/command.go:826 +0x460
github.com/openshift/origin/vendor/github.com/spf13/cobra.(*Command).ExecuteC(0xc00121b180, 0x0, 0x60d2d00, 0x9887ec8)
	/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/_output/local/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/vendor/github.com/spf13/cobra/command.go:914 +0x2fb
github.com/openshift/origin/vendor/github.com/spf13/cobra.(*Command).Execute(...)
	/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/_output/local/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/vendor/github.com/spf13/cobra/command.go:864
main.main.func1(0xc00121b180, 0x0, 0x0)
	/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/_output/local/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/cmd/openshift-tests/openshift-tests.go:59 +0x9c
main.main()
	/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/_output/local/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/cmd/openshift-tests/openshift-tests.go:60 +0x341
STEP: Cleaning up the pod client-a-jt4tf
STEP: Cleaning up the policy.

…y test failure

Sometimes the pod has already been cleaned up by the time the test
tried to grab the logs.

Mar 27 16:19:38.066: INFO: Waiting for client-a-jt4tf to complete.
Mar 27 16:19:38.066: INFO: Waiting up to 5m0s for pod "client-a-jt4tf" in namespace "e2e-network-policy-c-9007" to be "success or failure"
Mar 27 16:19:38.072: INFO: Pod "client-a-jt4tf": Phase="Pending", Reason="", readiness=false. Elapsed: 6.270302ms
Mar 27 16:19:40.078: INFO: Pod "client-a-jt4tf": Phase="Pending", Reason="", readiness=false. Elapsed: 2.01233019s
Mar 27 16:19:42.086: INFO: Pod "client-a-jt4tf": Phase="Succeeded", Reason="", readiness=false. Elapsed: 4.020186873s
STEP: Saw pod success
Mar 27 16:19:42.086: INFO: Pod "client-a-jt4tf" satisfied condition "success or failure"
Mar 27 16:19:42.093: FAIL: Error getting container logs: the server could not find the requested resource (get pods client-a-jt4tf)

Full Stack Trace
github.com/openshift/origin/vendor/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/network.checkNoConnectivity(0xc00104adc0, 0xc0016b82c0, 0xc001666400, 0xc000c32000)
	/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/_output/local/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/vendor/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/network/network_policy.go:1457 +0x2a0
github.com/openshift/origin/vendor/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/network.testCannotConnect(0xc00104adc0, 0xc0016b82c0, 0x55587e9, 0x8, 0xc000c32000, 0x50)
	/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/_output/local/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/vendor/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/network/network_policy.go:1406 +0x1fc
github.com/openshift/origin/vendor/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/network.glob..func13.2.7()
	/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/_output/local/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/vendor/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/network/network_policy.go:285 +0x883
github.com/openshift/origin/pkg/test/ginkgo.(*TestOptions).Run(0xc001e47830, 0xc001e50b70, 0x1, 0x1, 0x0, 0x0)
	/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/_output/local/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/pkg/test/ginkgo/cmd_runtest.go:59 +0x41f
main.newRunTestCommand.func1(0xc00121b900, 0xc001e50b70, 0x1, 0x1, 0x0, 0x0)
	/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/_output/local/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/cmd/openshift-tests/openshift-tests.go:238 +0x15d
github.com/openshift/origin/vendor/github.com/spf13/cobra.(*Command).execute(0xc00121b900, 0xc001e50b30, 0x1, 0x1, 0xc00121b900, 0xc001e50b30)
	/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/_output/local/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/vendor/github.com/spf13/cobra/command.go:826 +0x460
github.com/openshift/origin/vendor/github.com/spf13/cobra.(*Command).ExecuteC(0xc00121b180, 0x0, 0x60d2d00, 0x9887ec8)
	/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/_output/local/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/vendor/github.com/spf13/cobra/command.go:914 +0x2fb
github.com/openshift/origin/vendor/github.com/spf13/cobra.(*Command).Execute(...)
	/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/_output/local/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/vendor/github.com/spf13/cobra/command.go:864
main.main.func1(0xc00121b180, 0x0, 0x0)
	/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/_output/local/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/cmd/openshift-tests/openshift-tests.go:59 +0x9c
main.main()
	/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/_output/local/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/cmd/openshift-tests/openshift-tests.go:60 +0x341
STEP: Cleaning up the pod client-a-jt4tf
STEP: Cleaning up the policy.
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the vendor-update Touching vendor dir or related files label Mar 30, 2020
@dcbw
Copy link
Contributor Author

dcbw commented Mar 31, 2020

@danwinship @knobunc PTAL thanks... Ben has the approve power at least.

@danwinship
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 31, 2020
@knobunc
Copy link
Contributor

knobunc commented Apr 1, 2020

/approve

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: danwinship, dcbw, knobunc

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Apr 1, 2020
@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor

Master is flaky due to dockercfg secret, direct merging to get tests in better shape. Passed all tests and batch tests at least once.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. vendor-update Touching vendor dir or related files
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants