Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

clarify test failure message #24883

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Apr 23, 2020
Merged

Conversation

bparees
Copy link
Contributor

@bparees bparees commented Apr 16, 2020

No description provided.

@bparees
Copy link
Contributor Author

bparees commented Apr 16, 2020

/assign @adambkaplan

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Apr 16, 2020
@bparees
Copy link
Contributor Author

bparees commented Apr 19, 2020

/retest

@adambkaplan
Copy link
Contributor

/hold

The tests are ultimately flaking due to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823949. Based on the current thread this fix won't land in the immediate future. IMO the test should only check that the leader has the internal registry hostname - we don't need to wait for everything to be rolled out.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Apr 20, 2020
@bparees
Copy link
Contributor Author

bparees commented Apr 20, 2020

Based on the current thread this fix won't land in the immediate future.

it better land in the immediate future, it's a major product bug. We can't ship 4.4 w/ it. And we can't tolerate it in 4.5 for any length of time.

IMO the test should only check that the leader has the internal registry hostname - we don't need to wait for everything to be rolled out.

while it could do that, there is no reason under normal circumstances that the daemonset should not be successfully rolled out. Since we didn't seem to catch this elsewhere, if we're going to drop that check here, we need to ensure there is a test somewhere else that would catch cases like this. Personally i'd just leave it as is.

Copy link
Contributor

@adambkaplan adambkaplan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/hold cancel

/lgtm

I'm convinced we can leave as is - re-reading the thread, fixes are expected this week and this is considered an urgent blocker.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. and removed do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. labels Apr 20, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: adambkaplan, bparees

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

1 similar comment
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@bparees bparees added the bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Apr 23, 2020
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 5d066fc into openshift:master Apr 23, 2020
@bparees bparees deleted the errmsg branch March 29, 2021 21:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants