Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 1914343: Replacing centos with ubi in image-annotation test. #25786

Merged

Conversation

jaypoulz
Copy link
Contributor

@jaypoulz jaypoulz commented Jan 8, 2021

Centos is not compatible with s390x, resulting in observed flakeyness when this is run on s390x.

@jaypoulz jaypoulz changed the title Replacing centos with ubi in image-annotation test. Bugzilla 1914343: Replacing centos with ubi in image-annotation test. Jan 8, 2021
@jaypoulz
Copy link
Contributor Author

jaypoulz commented Jan 8, 2021

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@jaypoulz: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@jaypoulz jaypoulz changed the title Bugzilla 1914343: Replacing centos with ubi in image-annotation test. Bug 1914343: Replacing centos with ubi in image-annotation test. Jan 8, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/severity-low Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is low for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jan 8, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@jaypoulz: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1914343, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.7.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.7.0)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

In response to this:

Bug 1914343: Replacing centos with ubi in image-annotation test.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@jaypoulz
Copy link
Contributor Author

jaypoulz commented Jan 8, 2021

/test e2e-gcp-upgrade

Centos is not compatible with s390x, resulting in observed flakeyness when this is run on s390x.
@jaypoulz
Copy link
Contributor Author

jaypoulz commented Jan 8, 2021

/retest

@deepsm007
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@jaypoulz
Copy link
Contributor Author

jaypoulz commented Jan 8, 2021

/assign @ricardomaraschini

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 8, 2021
Copy link
Contributor

@ricardomaraschini ricardomaraschini left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: deepsm007, jaypoulz, ricardomaraschini

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 11, 2021
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

8 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

7 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@jaypoulz
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-gcp

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@jaypoulz: The specified target(s) for /test were not found.
The following commands are available to trigger jobs:

  • /test e2e-agnostic-cmd
  • /test e2e-aws
  • /test e2e-aws-csi
  • /test e2e-aws-disruptive
  • /test e2e-aws-fips
  • /test e2e-aws-image-registry
  • /test e2e-aws-jenkins
  • /test e2e-aws-multitenant
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn
  • /test e2e-aws-proxy
  • /test e2e-aws-serial
  • /test e2e-aws-upgrade
  • /test e2e-azure
  • /test e2e-gcp
  • /test e2e-gcp-builds
  • /test e2e-gcp-csi
  • /test e2e-gcp-disruptive
  • /test e2e-gcp-image-ecosystem
  • /test e2e-gcp-upgrade
  • /test e2e-openstack
  • /test e2e-vsphere
  • /test images
  • /test verify
  • /test verify-deps
  • /test extended_gssapi
  • /test extended_ldap_groups
  • /test extended_networking

Use /test all to run the following jobs:

  • pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-agnostic-cmd
  • pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-aws-csi
  • pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-aws-fips
  • pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-aws-image-registry
  • pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-aws-serial
  • pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-gcp
  • pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-gcp-csi
  • pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-gcp-upgrade
  • pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-images
  • pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-verify
  • pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-verify-deps

In response to this:

/test ci/prow/e2e-gcp

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@jaypoulz
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-gcp

1 similar comment
@jaypoulz
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-gcp

@jaypoulz
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@jaypoulz
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

1 similar comment
@jaypoulz
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

10 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 3a313a6 into openshift:master Jan 14, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@jaypoulz: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 1914343 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1914343: Replacing centos with ubi in image-annotation test.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@yselkowitz yselkowitz deleted the plz-no-more-centos branch October 5, 2021 18:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-low Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is low for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants