Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 1986003: bump k8s.io to 1.22.0-rc.0 #26366

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Aug 19, 2021

Conversation

soltysh
Copy link
Contributor

@soltysh soltysh commented Aug 2, 2021

@hexfusion for etcd changes
@jmencak and @sjug for test/extended/cluster, specifically Get rid of --viper-config which was removed in k8s commit

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. vendor-update Touching vendor dir or related files labels Aug 2, 2021
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from bparees and csrwng August 2, 2021 17:42
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. labels Aug 2, 2021
@jsafrane
Copy link
Contributor

jsafrane commented Aug 11, 2021

Lot of storage tests fail pulling images, e.g. a hostpath test needs:

quay.io/openshift/community-e2e-images:e2e-k8s-gcr-io-sig-storage-hostpathplugin-v1-7-1-stEGUP3RdCxjBvZm
quay.io/openshift/community-e2e-images:e2e-k8s-gcr-io-sig-storage-csi-node-driver-registrar-v2-2-0-FC5zbVTQJjyKeWTN
quay.io/openshift/community-e2e-images:e2e-k8s-gcr-io-sig-storage-livenessprobe-v2-3-0-Tj890_7cIpcf5FNv
quay.io/openshift/community-e2e-images:e2e-k8s-gcr-io-sig-storage-csi-attacher-v3-2-1-0hG8IcuRv5znfyad
quay.io/openshift/community-e2e-images:e2e-k8s-gcr-io-sig-storage-csi-provisioner-v2-2-1-6ayZekCswACr2PZ
quay.io/openshift/community-e2e-images:e2e-k8s-gcr-io-sig-storage-csi-resizer-v1-2-0-faYe_5IxC3bYJ5aV
quay.io/openshift/community-e2e-images:e2e-k8s-gcr-io-sig-storage-csi-snapshotter-v4-1-1-1mL85KiLHcB-HQCq

csi-mock tests need:
community-e2e-images:e2e-k8s-gcr-io-sig-storage-csi-provisioner-v2-2-0-ds1aHLBGR-k_J8tr

@jsafrane
Copy link
Contributor

jsafrane commented Aug 11, 2021

Failures in both e2e-gcp-csi and e2e-aws-csi (and other CSI jobs) are known bugs, we need updated CSI drivers.

multiVolume [Slow] should concurrently access the volume and restored snapshot from pods on the same node

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1988371
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1988373

These jobs are not mandatory, we probably don't need to disable these tests.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Aug 11, 2021
@soltysh soltysh changed the title [WIP] Bump k8s.io to 1.22.0-rc.0 Bump k8s.io to 1.22.0-rc.0 Aug 11, 2021
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Aug 11, 2021
@soltysh soltysh changed the title Bump k8s.io to 1.22.0-rc.0 Bug 1986003: bump k8s.io to 1.22.0-rc.0 Aug 11, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 11, 2021

@soltysh: An error was encountered querying GitHub for users with public email (kewang@redhat.com) for bug 1986003 on the Bugzilla server at https://bugzilla.redhat.com. No known errors were detected, please see the full error message for details.

Full error message. non-200 OK status code: 403 Forbidden body: "{\n \"documentation_url\": \"https://docs.github.com/en/free-pro-team@latest/rest/overview/resources-in-the-rest-api#secondary-rate-limits\",\n \"message\": \"You have exceeded a secondary rate limit. Please wait a few minutes before you try again.\"\n}\n"

Please contact an administrator to resolve this issue, then request a bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

Bug 1986003: bump k8s.io to 1.22.0-rc.0

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@soltysh
Copy link
Contributor Author

soltysh commented Aug 11, 2021

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. label Aug 11, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 11, 2021

@soltysh: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1986003, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.9.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.9.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @wangke19

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Aug 11, 2021
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from wangke19 August 11, 2021 11:20
@soltysh
Copy link
Contributor Author

soltysh commented Aug 11, 2021

/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6

@soltysh
Copy link
Contributor Author

soltysh commented Aug 11, 2021

Lot of storage tests fail pulling images, e.g. a hostpath test needs:

@jsafrane updated those just minutes ago.

@rphillips
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

@jsafrane
Copy link
Contributor

Sorry, I found these two missing images:

Back-off pulling image "quay.io/openshift/community-e2e-images:e2e-k8s-gcr-io-sig-storage-csi-attacher-v3-2-0-XMbbzU2ED4Dglu2H"
Back-off pulling image "quay.io/openshift/community-e2e-images:e2e-k8s-gcr-io-sig-storage-csi-snapshotter-v4-0-0-1JRsupiNS_D6T7c_"

@soltysh
Copy link
Contributor Author

soltysh commented Aug 18, 2021

/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6

@soltysh
Copy link
Contributor Author

soltysh commented Aug 18, 2021

/test e2e-aws-single-node

@soltysh
Copy link
Contributor Author

soltysh commented Aug 18, 2021

/retest

2 similar comments
@soltysh
Copy link
Contributor Author

soltysh commented Aug 18, 2021

/retest

@wallylewis
Copy link

/retest

@soltysh
Copy link
Contributor Author

soltysh commented Aug 18, 2021

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-single-node
it's optional

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 18, 2021

@soltysh: Overrode contexts on behalf of soltysh: ci/prow/e2e-aws-single-node

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-single-node
it's optional

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Copy link
Contributor

@ravisantoshgudimetla ravisantoshgudimetla left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

Thank you for the bump @soltysh

cc @romfreiman for SNO changes.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 18, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 18, 2021

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ravisantoshgudimetla, soltysh, sttts

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@wallylewis
Copy link

/retest-required

@wallylewis
Copy link

/retest

@wallylewis
Copy link

/retest-required

@soltysh
Copy link
Contributor Author

soltysh commented Aug 19, 2021

/override ci/prow/e2e-gcp-builds
it's optional

/test e2e-gcp-upgrade
/test e2e-gcp

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 19, 2021

@soltysh: Overrode contexts on behalf of soltysh: ci/prow/e2e-gcp-builds

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-gcp-builds
it's optional

/test e2e-gcp-upgrade
/test e2e-gcp

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@soltysh
Copy link
Contributor Author

soltysh commented Aug 19, 2021

/test e2e-gcp-upgrade

@soltysh
Copy link
Contributor Author

soltysh commented Aug 19, 2021

/test e2e-gcp

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 19, 2021

@soltysh: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-aws-csi fda3e1e link /test e2e-aws-csi

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@soltysh
Copy link
Contributor Author

soltysh commented Aug 19, 2021

/test e2e-aws-fips

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit aa7e238 into openshift:master Aug 19, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 19, 2021

@soltysh: Some pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

The following pull requests linked via external trackers have not merged:

These pull request must merge or be unlinked from the Bugzilla bug in order for it to move to the next state. Once unlinked, request a bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Bugzilla bug 1986003 has not been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1986003: bump k8s.io to 1.22.0-rc.0

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. vendor-update Touching vendor dir or related files
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants