Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OCPBUGS-25610: fix: lane e2e-gcp-ovn-builds perma fail #28471

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Dec 20, 2023

Conversation

eggfoobar
Copy link
Contributor

Recent changes to image streams removed ruby 2.7 in 4.15, updating to use ruby 3.0 in test build assets.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/severity-moderate Referenced Jira bug's severity is moderate for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Dec 18, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@eggfoobar: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-25610, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.16.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.16.0)
  • bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

Recent changes to image streams removed ruby 2.7 in 4.15, updating to use ruby 3.0 in test build assets.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@dgoodwin
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Dec 18, 2023
@sdodson
Copy link
Member

sdodson commented Dec 18, 2023

/retitle OCPBUGS-24569,OCPBUGS-25610: fix: lane e2e-gcp-ovn-builds perma fail

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot changed the title OCPBUGS-25610: fix: lane e2e-gcp-ovn-builds perma fail OCPBUGS-24569,OCPBUGS-25610: fix: lane e2e-gcp-ovn-builds perma fail Dec 18, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Dec 18, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@eggfoobar: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-24569, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to be open, but it isn't
  • expected the bug to target the "4.16.0" version, but no target version was set
  • expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, POST, but it is Closed (Duplicate) instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-25610, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.16.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.16.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

Recent changes to image streams removed ruby 2.7 in 4.15, updating to use ruby 3.0 in test build assets.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@sdodson
Copy link
Member

sdodson commented Dec 18, 2023

/retitle OCPBUGS-25610: fix: lane e2e-gcp-ovn-builds perma fail
Nevermind, the other bug was already closed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot changed the title OCPBUGS-24569,OCPBUGS-25610: fix: lane e2e-gcp-ovn-builds perma fail OCPBUGS-25610: fix: lane e2e-gcp-ovn-builds perma fail Dec 18, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Dec 18, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@eggfoobar: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-25610, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.16.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.16.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

Recent changes to image streams removed ruby 2.7 in 4.15, updating to use ruby 3.0 in test build assets.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Recent changes to image streams removed ruby 2.7 in 4.15, updating to use ruby 3.0 in test build assets

Signed-off-by: ehila <ehila@redhat.com>
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 4bf8001 and 2 for PR HEAD b6cfeb3 in total

@openshift-trt-bot
Copy link

Job Failure Risk Analysis for sha: b6cfeb3

Job Name Failure Risk
pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade High
[sig-cluster-lifecycle] pathological event should not see excessive Back-off restarting failed containers
This test has passed 99.13% of 460 runs on jobs ['periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.16-e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade' 'periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.16-e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade'] in the last 14 days.
pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6 IncompleteTests
Tests for this run (24) are below the historical average (1392): IncompleteTests (not enough tests ran to make a reasonable risk analysis; this could be due to infra, installation, or upgrade problems)

Updated all tests to correctly match against the new 3.0 version of Ruby
Moved incremental auth build to 2.5 to account for server dependency

Signed-off-by: ehila <ehila@redhat.com>
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 18, 2023
@eggfoobar
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-gcp-ovn-builds

@eggfoobar
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest-required

@eggfoobar
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-gcp-ovn-builds

@eggfoobar
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest-required

@eggfoobar
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks for the heads up, checking them now

@openshift-trt-bot
Copy link

Job Failure Risk Analysis for sha: 579bf42

Job Name Failure Risk
pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-serial IncompleteTests
Tests for this run (98) are below the historical average (533): IncompleteTests (not enough tests ran to make a reasonable risk analysis; this could be due to infra, installation, or upgrade problems)
pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-aws-ovn-fips IncompleteTests
Tests for this run (98) are below the historical average (1417): IncompleteTests (not enough tests ran to make a reasonable risk analysis; this could be due to infra, installation, or upgrade problems)
pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-agnostic-ovn-cmd IncompleteTests
Tests for this run (98) are below the historical average (556): IncompleteTests (not enough tests ran to make a reasonable risk analysis; this could be due to infra, installation, or upgrade problems)

Signed-off-by: ehila <ehila@redhat.com>
@dgoodwin
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 19, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 19, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dgoodwin, eggfoobar

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 4bf8001 and 2 for PR HEAD 66a074c in total

@eggfoobar
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest-required

1 similar comment
@eggfoobar
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest-required

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 14c37c2 and 1 for PR HEAD 66a074c in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 2736628 and 0 for PR HEAD 66a074c in total

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 20, 2023

@eggfoobar: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-agnostic-ovn-cmd 66a074c link false /test e2e-agnostic-ovn-cmd
ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-sdn 66a074c link false /test e2e-metal-ipi-sdn
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-single-node 66a074c link false /test e2e-aws-ovn-single-node
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-serial 66a074c link false /test e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-serial
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-upgrade 66a074c link false /test e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-upgrade
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-cgroupsv2 66a074c link false /test e2e-aws-ovn-cgroupsv2
ci/prow/e2e-aws-csi 66a074c link false /test e2e-aws-csi
ci/prow/e2e-openstack-ovn 66a074c link false /test e2e-openstack-ovn
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-ovn-rt-upgrade 66a074c link false /test e2e-gcp-ovn-rt-upgrade
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-csi 66a074c link false /test e2e-gcp-csi

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-trt-bot
Copy link

Job Failure Risk Analysis for sha: 66a074c

Job Name Failure Risk
pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-openstack-ovn IncompleteTests
Tests for this run (97) are below the historical average (1310): IncompleteTests (not enough tests ran to make a reasonable risk analysis; this could be due to infra, installation, or upgrade problems)
pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-gcp-csi IncompleteTests
Tests for this run (99) are below the historical average (589): IncompleteTests (not enough tests ran to make a reasonable risk analysis; this could be due to infra, installation, or upgrade problems)
pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-serial IncompleteTests
Tests for this run (97) are below the historical average (522): IncompleteTests (not enough tests ran to make a reasonable risk analysis; this could be due to infra, installation, or upgrade problems)
pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-aws-ovn-single-node IncompleteTests
Tests for this run (97) are below the historical average (1192): IncompleteTests (not enough tests ran to make a reasonable risk analysis; this could be due to infra, installation, or upgrade problems)
pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-aws-ovn-cgroupsv2 IncompleteTests
Tests for this run (97) are below the historical average (1571): IncompleteTests (not enough tests ran to make a reasonable risk analysis; this could be due to infra, installation, or upgrade problems)
pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-agnostic-ovn-cmd IncompleteTests
Tests for this run (98) are below the historical average (530): IncompleteTests (not enough tests ran to make a reasonable risk analysis; this could be due to infra, installation, or upgrade problems)

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 9fe2f1e into openshift:master Dec 20, 2023
14 of 24 checks passed
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@eggfoobar: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-25610: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-25610 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Recent changes to image streams removed ruby 2.7 in 4.15, updating to use ruby 3.0 in test build assets.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER]

This PR has been included in build openshift-enterprise-tests-container-v4.16.0-202312200735.p0.g9fe2f1e.assembly.stream for distgit openshift-enterprise-tests.
All builds following this will include this PR.

@eggfoobar
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cherrypick release-4.15

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@eggfoobar: new pull request created: #28479

In response to this:

/cherrypick release-4.15

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@eggfoobar
Copy link
Contributor Author

Interesting, not sure how that happened since the shell script seemed to deploy the image streams with 2.7 present, looking into it now. Thanks @ardaguclu

@eggfoobar
Copy link
Contributor Author

Fix PR is here @ardaguclu assigned it to you, #28481

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/severity-moderate Referenced Jira bug's severity is moderate for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

8 participants