Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

UPSTREAM: 10647 (carry until 10656): increase Kubelet timeouts to 1 hour #3760

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 20, 2015

Conversation

ncdc
Copy link
Contributor

@ncdc ncdc commented Jul 17, 2015

This makes the Kubelet's read and write timeouts match the master.

10647 isn't going to be merged. Instead, 10656 will finer-grained
timeouts based on the type of request, but it's not merged upstream yet.
Once 10656 is merged, we can drop this patch.

This makes the Kubelet's read and write timeouts match the master.

10647 isn't going to be merged. Instead, 10656 will finer-grained
timeouts based on the type of request, but it's not merged upstream yet.
Once 10656 is merged, we can drop this patch.
@ncdc
Copy link
Contributor Author

ncdc commented Jul 17, 2015

@liggitt
Copy link
Contributor

liggitt commented Jul 17, 2015

LGTM, but I'd like a second

@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor

deads2k commented Jul 17, 2015

Straightforward, but can't this end up putting pressure on our MaxInFlight limit if we don't timeout connections as often?

@liggitt
Copy link
Contributor

liggitt commented Jul 17, 2015

I thought we only had maxinflight set on the API server, which already had a long timeout

@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor

MaxInFlight can already be consumed - the practical difference between "I get a chance every 5 minutes to sneak a request in" and "I get a chance every 60 minutes" isn't much (the solution is to more aggressively limit). We could go to 15 or 20 minutes. What's the 95% build duration?

@liggitt
Copy link
Contributor

liggitt commented Jul 19, 2015

Also affects exec lifetime, not just build logs

@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor

And port forward

On Jul 18, 2015, at 9:40 PM, Jordan Liggitt notifications@github.com
wrote:

Also affects exec lifetime, not just build logs


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#3760 (comment).

@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor

deads2k commented Jul 20, 2015

lgtm [merge]

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

continuous-integration/openshift-jenkins/merge SUCCESS (https://ci.openshift.redhat.com/jenkins/job/merge_pull_requests_origin/2779/) (Image: devenv-fedora_2029)

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Evaluated for origin up to 46f9bb3

openshift-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 20, 2015
@openshift-bot openshift-bot merged commit 1695461 into openshift:master Jul 20, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants