Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

oadm: bump prune deployments description/examples #6729

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 21, 2016
Merged

oadm: bump prune deployments description/examples #6729

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 21, 2016

Conversation

0xmichalis
Copy link
Contributor

@0xmichalis
Copy link
Contributor Author

@php-coder fyi

@fabianofranz
Copy link
Member

LGTM

@0xmichalis
Copy link
Contributor Author

[merge]

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

[Test]ing while waiting on the merge queue

@openshift-bot openshift-bot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jan 20, 2016
@openshift-bot openshift-bot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jan 21, 2016
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

continuous-integration/openshift-jenkins/merge SUCCESS (https://ci.openshift.redhat.com/jenkins/job/test_pr_origin/239/) (Image: devenv-rhel7_3204)

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Evaluated for origin test up to eefad09

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Evaluated for origin merge up to eefad09

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

continuous-integration/openshift-jenkins/test SUCCESS (https://ci.openshift.redhat.com/jenkins/job/test_pr_origin/239/)

openshift-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 21, 2016
@openshift-bot openshift-bot merged commit 2670ca0 into openshift:master Jan 21, 2016
@0xmichalis 0xmichalis deleted the prune-deployments-desc-enhancement branch January 21, 2016 12:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants