Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make CentOS a build-time option again #2

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 7, 2018

Conversation

cgwalters
Copy link
Member

Big picture...we are going to cross a need for a freely
available version. Otherwise too many things get painful;
it's not easy for other people to contribute.

So let's add CentOS back as an option. I split the host
build in two. I also deleted the rhel repo as only RHT
employees can use it today. And in general people will
want to configure it anyways if they're doing custom
builds.

Big picture...we are going to cross a need for a freely
available version.  Otherwise too many things get painful;
it's not easy for other people to contribute.

So let's add CentOS back as an option.  I split the host
build in two.  I also deleted the rhel repo as only RHT
employees can use it today.  And in general people will
want to configure it anyways if they're doing custom
builds.
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label May 4, 2018
@cgwalters
Copy link
Member Author

/ok-to-test

@cgwalters
Copy link
Member Author

/test build

@cgwalters cgwalters mentioned this pull request May 5, 2018
@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor

/test build

1 similar comment
@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor

/test build

@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Minor: Hi, looks like this file is not being used? The container image will still use its own gpg key if we don't copy this file to /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/ right?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good catch! I think you're right. Though it might still be useful to keep it in the repo for folks composing locally, I guess?

@jlebon
Copy link
Member

jlebon commented May 7, 2018

It looks like this is working. So let's give it a try!

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 7, 2018
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 547ac91 into openshift:master May 7, 2018
@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor

I'll set up a branch job that pushes the image somewhere for you guys today.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants