Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 1888352: Fix IPv6 neighbor discovery hack #313

Merged

Conversation

danwinship
Copy link
Contributor

@danwinship danwinship commented Oct 19, 2020

Fixes an IPv6 regression introduced by #238

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@danwinship: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

WIP Fix IPv6 neighbor discovery hack

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Oct 19, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 19, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@danwinship: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

WIP Fix IPv6 neighbor discovery hack

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@danwinship danwinship changed the title WIP Fix IPv6 neighbor discovery hack Bug 1888352: Fix IPv6 neighbor discovery hack Oct 19, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/severity-urgent Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is urgent for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. labels Oct 19, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@danwinship: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1888352, which is invalid:

  • expected Bugzilla bug 1888352 to depend on a bug targeting a release in 4.6.0, 4.6.z and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but no dependents were found

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Bug 1888352: Fix IPv6 neighbor discovery hack

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Oct 19, 2020
@danwinship
Copy link
Contributor Author

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Oct 19, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@danwinship: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1888352, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.5.z) matches configured target release for branch (4.5.z)
  • bug is in the state NEW, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)
  • dependent bug Bugzilla bug 1889507 is in the state VERIFIED, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA))
  • dependent Bugzilla bug 1889507 targets the "4.6.z" release, which is one of the valid target releases: 4.6.0, 4.6.z
  • bug has dependents

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@danwinship: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1888352, which is valid.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.5.z) matches configured target release for branch (4.5.z)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)
  • dependent bug Bugzilla bug 1889507 is in the state VERIFIED, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA))
  • dependent Bugzilla bug 1889507 targets the "4.6.z" release, which is one of the valid target releases: 4.6.0, 4.6.z
  • bug has dependents

In response to this:

Bug 1888352: Fix IPv6 neighbor discovery hack

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@trozet
Copy link
Contributor

trozet commented Oct 19, 2020

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 19, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: danwinship, trozet

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@stbenjam
Copy link
Member

/refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@danwinship: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn 204e2b2 link /test e2e-aws-ovn

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@stbenjam
Copy link
Member

/test e2e-aws-ovn

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

3 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@elfosardo
Copy link

/test e2e-aws-ovn

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

1 similar comment
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@stbenjam
Copy link
Member

@danwinship Is the aws-ovn failure legit? It looks like the last periodics on 4.5 have passed aws-ovn, but it's consistently failing here.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

1 similar comment
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@danwinship
Copy link
Contributor Author

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn

Each run is failing different tests. I think it's just really flaky. ☹️
And the PR only affects IPv6 anyway, so it's definitely not the cause of the e2e-aws-ovn failure

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@danwinship: Overrode contexts on behalf of danwinship: ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn

Each run is failing different tests. I think it's just really flaky. ☹️
And the PR only affects IPv6 anyway, so it's definitely not the cause of the e2e-aws-ovn failure

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@stbenjam
Copy link
Member

stbenjam commented Oct 20, 2020

Tide isn't reporting status to GitHub, but I guess it's still doing it's thing. We need a cherry-pick-approved label. Not sure if anyone wants to try to bug the patch manager about it, but I would guess they should get to it soon since severity is urgent.

@bparees bparees added the cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. label Oct 21, 2020
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

3 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@elfosardo
Copy link

/test e2e-aws-ovn

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@elfosardo
Copy link

/test e2e-aws-ovn

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@elfosardo
Copy link

/test e2e-aws-ovn

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 1fe1747 into openshift:release-4.5 Oct 22, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@danwinship: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 1888352 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1888352: Fix IPv6 neighbor discovery hack

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@danwinship danwinship deleted the fix-ipv6-mac-hack-45 branch October 22, 2020 12:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-urgent Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is urgent for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

8 participants