Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 2011386: pods: fix overwriting returned error from defer() #787

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 8, 2021

Conversation

dcbw
Copy link
Contributor

@dcbw dcbw commented Oct 8, 2021

Using the same error variable name in the defer() overwrote
the error itself, and caused the function to return nil even
though an error had occurred.

This is only an issue downstream as the problem code only exists downstream as a CARRY.

@trozet

@dcbw dcbw changed the title pods: fix overwriting returned error from defer() Bug 2011386: pods: fix overwriting returned error from defer() Oct 8, 2021
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Oct 8, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 8, 2021

@dcbw: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2011386, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.10.0" release, but it targets "---" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Bug 2011386: pods: fix overwriting returned error from defer()

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@dcbw
Copy link
Contributor Author

dcbw commented Oct 8, 2021

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Oct 8, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 8, 2021

@dcbw: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2011386, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.10.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.10.0)
  • bug is in the state NEW, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @anuragthehatter

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@dcbw
Copy link
Contributor Author

dcbw commented Oct 8, 2021

/retest

Using the same error variable name in the defer() overwrote
the error itself, and caused the function to return nil even
though an error had occurred.

Fixes: 35dd1ae CARRY: run all pod deletion OVN commands as a batch
@dcbw
Copy link
Contributor Author

dcbw commented Oct 8, 2021

/hold cancel

Copy link
Contributor

@tssurya tssurya left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

err = oc.ovnNBClient.Execute(addrSetCmds...)
if err != nil {
klog.Errorf("Error removing pod %s IPs from namespace address set: %v", portName, err)
if addrErr := oc.ovnNBClient.Execute(addrSetCmds...); addrErr != nil {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ha ha nice catch!

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 8, 2021
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

3 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@trozet
Copy link
Contributor

trozet commented Oct 8, 2021

/lgtm

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 8, 2021

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dcbw, trozet, tssurya

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

1 similar comment
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 8, 2021

@dcbw: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/okd-e2e-gcp-ovn 0505367 link false /test okd-e2e-gcp-ovn
ci/prow/e2e-azure-ovn 0505367 link false /test e2e-azure-ovn

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

2 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit ace0536 into openshift:master Oct 8, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 8, 2021

@dcbw: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 2011386 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 2011386: pods: fix overwriting returned error from defer()

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants