Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 2056883: Revert "HACK: disable skip_snat for load balancers." #942

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 23, 2022
Merged

Bug 2056883: Revert "HACK: disable skip_snat for load balancers." #942

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 23, 2022

Conversation

squeed
Copy link
Contributor

@squeed squeed commented Feb 2, 2022

This reverts commit f303076.

This is no longer needed, now that https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1995326 has landed.

This reverts commit f303076.

This is no longer needed.
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 2, 2022

@squeed: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

Revert "HACK: disable skip_snat for load balancers."

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Feb 2, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 2, 2022

@squeed: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/4.9-upgrade-from-stable-4.8-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade 6ed94f0 link false /test 4.9-upgrade-from-stable-4.8-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade
ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6 6ed94f0 link false /test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6
ci/prow/okd-e2e-gcp-ovn 6ed94f0 link false /test okd-e2e-gcp-ovn
ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-ovn 6ed94f0 link false /test e2e-vsphere-ovn
ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-windows 6ed94f0 link false /test e2e-vsphere-windows
ci/prow/e2e-azure-ovn 6ed94f0 link false /test e2e-azure-ovn

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@squeed squeed changed the title Revert "HACK: disable skip_snat for load balancers." Bug 2056883: Revert "HACK: disable skip_snat for load balancers." Feb 22, 2022
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Feb 22, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 22, 2022

@squeed: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2056883, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 2056878 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is NEW instead
  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 2056878 to target a release in 4.10.0, but it targets "4.10.z" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Bug 2056883: Revert "HACK: disable skip_snat for load balancers."

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@trozet
Copy link
Contributor

trozet commented Feb 22, 2022

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 22, 2022

@trozet: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2056883, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 2056878 to target a release in 4.10.0, but it targets "4.10.z" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@trozet
Copy link
Contributor

trozet commented Feb 22, 2022

/bugzilla refresh

@trozet
Copy link
Contributor

trozet commented Feb 22, 2022

/lgtm
/label backport-risk-assessed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Feb 22, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 22, 2022

@trozet: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2056883, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.9.z) matches configured target release for branch (4.9.z)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)
  • dependent bug Bugzilla bug 2056878 is in the state VERIFIED, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE))
  • dependent Bugzilla bug 2056878 targets the "4.10.0" release, which is one of the valid target releases: 4.10.0
  • bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @anuragthehatter

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 22, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 22, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: squeed, trozet

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

7 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

4 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@squeed
Copy link
Contributor Author

squeed commented Feb 23, 2022

@trozet this is ready to go in

@squeed
Copy link
Contributor Author

squeed commented Feb 23, 2022

@anuragthehatter can you add cherry-pick-approved please?

@anuragthehatter
Copy link

/label cherry-pick-approved

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. label Feb 23, 2022
@anuragthehatter
Copy link

/label qe-approved

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the qe-approved Signifies that QE has signed off on this PR label Feb 23, 2022
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

3 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit cf54021 into openshift:release-4.9 Feb 23, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 23, 2022

@squeed: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 2056883 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 2056883: Revert "HACK: disable skip_snat for load balancers."

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. qe-approved Signifies that QE has signed off on this PR
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants