New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
OCPQE-21220: [4.16] move more ci jobs to multi arch ci #51338
Conversation
/pj-rehearse periodic-ci-openshift-openshift-tests-private-release-4.16-multi-nightly-4.16-upgrade-from-stable-4.15-gcp-upi-arm-f28 periodic-ci-openshift-openshift-tests-private-release-4.16-multi-nightly-4.16-upgrade-from-stable-4.15-gcp-ipi-oidc-rt-fips-amd-f14 |
@jianlinliu: now processing your pj-rehearse request. Please allow up to 10 minutes for jobs to trigger or cancel. |
@yunjiang29 @jinyunma @jianli-wei pls help review, also cc @JianLi-RH to be noticed. |
/pj-rehearse ack |
@jianlinliu: now processing your pj-rehearse request. Please allow up to 10 minutes for jobs to trigger or cancel. |
seems that profile |
Maybe I can update |
I'm okay for the change in upgrade CI. |
Good point, for now, I am seeing |
Checked with @Phaow , their BYOK cases are all non-destructive, so better to use non-destructive job to cover Edit: seems that current job is as expected, using non-destructive job to cover |
Right, my last message confused you, the current jobs are there as our expectation. |
LGTM for azure part |
Done |
[REHEARSALNOTIFIER]
A total of 49 jobs have been affected by this change. The above listing is non-exhaustive and limited to 25 jobs. A full list of affected jobs can be found here Interacting with pj-rehearseComment: Once you are satisfied with the results of the rehearsals, comment: |
/pj-rehearse ack |
@jianlinliu: now processing your pj-rehearse request. Please allow up to 10 minutes for jobs to trigger or cancel. |
@jianlinliu: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
/lgtm |
cc @liangxia to review. |
/lgtm |
@jianlinliu: This pull request references OCPQE-21220 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the sub-task to target the "4.16.0" version, but no target version was set. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
/lgtm |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: jianli-wei, jianlinliu, jinyunma, liangxia The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/lgtm |
azure-ipi-disk-encryption-set
is already covered byazure-ipi-des-minimal-permission-amd-mixarch
azure-ipi-ovn-ipsec
is already covered byazure-ipi-ovn-ipsec-arm-mixarch
minimal-permission
tomini-perm
for a shorter job name and keep consistent across all platforms.ipi-ovn-ipsec-arm-mixarch
test frequency a bit, because more ci jobs are added in multi-arch ci.