Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use ServiceAliasConfigKeys for dynamic config #108

Conversation

alexcern
Copy link
Contributor

@alexcern alexcern commented Mar 25, 2020

Following #51 doing it for other template methods.

Verified that the router is functional with these changes and ROUTER_HAPROXY_CONFIG_MANAGER='true'

Fixes #107

Following openshift#51 doing it
for other template methods
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @alexcern. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a openshift member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Mar 25, 2020
@ironcladlou
Copy link
Contributor

/approve
/ok-to-test

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Mar 25, 2020
@alexcern
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

2 similar comments
@alexcern
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@alexcern
Copy link
Contributor Author

alexcern commented May 5, 2020

/retest

@Miciah
Copy link
Contributor

Miciah commented Jul 27, 2020

Nice, thanks!
/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 27, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: alexcern, ironcladlou, Miciah

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

5 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 9eca5f2 into openshift:master Jul 28, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Dynamic config manager not functional in 4.4
6 participants