Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 1991551: update usage of Events for 1.22 rebase #332

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 18, 2021

Conversation

danwinship
Copy link
Contributor

@danwinship danwinship commented Aug 9, 2021

The new k8s.io/client-go/tools/events version of Eventf() sneakily added a new argument before the trailing message+args, so we're ending up with events with

Action:"The service-port %s:%s needs pods."
Note:"test-service%!(EXTRA string=http)"

This adds an "action" to each event. The documentation is not very useful, but this seems consistent with how it is used in some places in k/k...


Additionally, it turns out that openshift-controller-manager is not compatible with openshift-sdn using the new Event API for unidling, because it assumes the LastTimestamp field of the event will be set, but this field is deprecated in eventsv1.Event, and not set by the convenience APIs. Thus, for now, revert back to using the legacy API for the unidling proxy.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 9, 2021

@danwinship: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1991551, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.9.0" release, but it targets "---" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Bug 1991551: Use the new k8s.io/client-go/tools/events Eventf() correctly

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Aug 9, 2021
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 9, 2021
@danwinship
Copy link
Contributor Author

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Aug 9, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 9, 2021

@danwinship: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1991551, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.9.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.9.0)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @zhaozhanqi

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Aug 9, 2021
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from zhaozhanqi August 9, 2021 19:43
@danwinship danwinship changed the title Bug 1991551: Use the new k8s.io/client-go/tools/events Eventf() correctly Bug 1991551: update usage of Events for 1.22 rebase Aug 10, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 10, 2021

@danwinship: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1991551, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.9.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.9.0)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @zhaozhanqi

In response to this:

Bug 1991551: update usage of Events for 1.22 rebase

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@danwinship
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@squeed
Copy link
Contributor

squeed commented Aug 10, 2021

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 10, 2021
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Aug 10, 2021
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. labels Aug 10, 2021
openshift-controller-manager is not currently compatible with
eventsv1.Event, and will fail to unidle pods as a result.
@danwinship
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@danwinship
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest-required

@abhat
Copy link
Contributor

abhat commented Aug 18, 2021

/test e2e-aws-upgrade

@@ -180,7 +182,15 @@ func (sdn *openShiftSDN) runProxy(waitChan chan<- bool) {
}

if enableUnidling {
signaler := unidler.NewEventSignaler(recorder)
// FIXME: openshift-controller-manager assumes the LastTimestamp field in

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is there some way to track the fix we need to make in openshift-controller-manager for this?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@astoycos
Copy link

/lgtm

I just wan't to make sure we actually remember to go back and fix the openshift-controller-manager

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 18, 2021

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: astoycos, danwinship, squeed

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 18, 2021
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit ba1a82a into openshift:master Aug 18, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 18, 2021

@danwinship: Some pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

The following pull requests linked via external trackers have not merged:

These pull request must merge or be unlinked from the Bugzilla bug in order for it to move to the next state. Once unlinked, request a bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Bugzilla bug 1991551 has not been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1991551: update usage of Events for 1.22 rebase

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@danwinship danwinship deleted the fix-eventf branch August 20, 2021 16:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants