New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[release-4.15] OCPBUGS-27503: Use DSR load balancing in kube-proxy #2024
[release-4.15] OCPBUGS-27503: Use DSR load balancing in kube-proxy #2024
Conversation
Changes the method of choosing a sourceVIP for kube-proxy to be in line with Microsoft guidelines. The HNS endpoint for the VIPEndpoint interface is no longer needed.
The port reservation logic in kube-proxy's dsr mode is better tested. Without using DSR, packet loss was being seen by on Windows Server 2019.
Explicity allows incoming traffic for the Windows Exporter metrics server running on Windows nodes.
Adds new function to help scale up/down the cluster machine approver deployment.
Adjusts the update test ensure it works when Machines are recreated as part of an upgrade. This will happen when the userdata is changed between two releases. The existing problems are that the Cluster Machine Approver needs to be scaled so CSRs can be approved, and that storage workloads which are being used to test across upgrades need to not be assigned a Node affinity. If there is an affinity on the Node that is replaced, the workload will not be able to be rescheduled.
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-26761 has been cloned as Jira Issue OCPBUGS-27503. Will retitle bug to link to clone. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
/approve |
/lgtm |
/jira refresh |
@mtnbikenc: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-26761, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
/retitle [release-4.15] OCPBUGS-27503: Use DSR load balancing in kube-proxy |
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-27503, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 6 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
/test remaining-required |
/approve |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: mansikulkarni96, openshift-cherrypick-robot The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/lgtm |
1 similar comment
/lgtm |
platform-none-vsphere-e2e-operator job blocked by: |
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
9581032
into
openshift:release-4.15
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-27503: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-27503 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
/cherry-pick release-4.14 |
@sebsoto: #2024 failed to apply on top of branch "release-4.14":
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
This is an automated cherry-pick of #2006
/assign sebsoto