Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add deferred datagram limit to QUIC Record Layer RX #19251

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

hlandau
Copy link
Member

@hlandau hlandau commented Sep 20, 2022

While talking about the QUIC record layer, I noticed that I didn't impose any limit on the number of deferred datagrams we buffer. This could allow a malicious peer to deliberately avoid sending packets which would cause the next EL to become ready, then send us an infinite number of packets we can't yet decrypt. This fixes that and allows a limit to be imposed.

@hlandau hlandau added branch: master Merge to master branch approval: review pending This pull request needs review by a committer approval: otc review pending This pull request needs review by an OTC member triaged: bug The issue/pr is/fixes a bug labels Sep 20, 2022
@hlandau hlandau self-assigned this Sep 20, 2022
@levitte levitte removed the approval: otc review pending This pull request needs review by an OTC member label Sep 21, 2022
@t8m t8m added approval: done This pull request has the required number of approvals and removed approval: review pending This pull request needs review by a committer labels Sep 21, 2022
@openssl-machine openssl-machine added approval: ready to merge The 24 hour grace period has passed, ready to merge and removed approval: done This pull request has the required number of approvals labels Sep 22, 2022
@openssl-machine
Copy link
Collaborator

This pull request is ready to merge

@hlandau
Copy link
Member Author

hlandau commented Sep 22, 2022

Merged to master.

@hlandau hlandau closed this Sep 22, 2022
openssl-machine pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 22, 2022
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from #19251)
sftcd pushed a commit to sftcd/openssl that referenced this pull request Sep 24, 2022
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from openssl#19251)
beldmit pushed a commit to beldmit/openssl that referenced this pull request Dec 26, 2022
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from openssl#19251)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approval: ready to merge The 24 hour grace period has passed, ready to merge branch: master Merge to master branch triaged: bug The issue/pr is/fixes a bug
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants