-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Updates NEWS for the 1.1.1 release #7164
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice!
@@ -8,19 +8,36 @@ | |||
Major changes between OpenSSL 1.1.0i and OpenSSL 1.1.1 [in pre-release] | |||
|
|||
o Support for TLSv1.3 added |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Only one line for the largest new feature? How modest!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
One could perhaps talk about the state machine rewrite, extension handling rewrite, and packet-construction code that were added to support it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The state machine rewrite and packet construction code were done for 1.1.0. There were of course new states added for TLSv1.3. The packet writing code is new in 1.1.1
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Of course I realise what I just wrote about packets made absolutely no sense... :-)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@mattcaswell, how about stealing some lines from your blog post or mentioning RFC8446 😉 ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not exactly under the TLS 1.3 aegis, but do we think that the addition of the clienthello callback merits a mention?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
See #7167
Pushed. |
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org> (Merged from #7164)
No description provided.