Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add links to glossary #27

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from
Closed

Add links to glossary #27

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

paulidale
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@paulidale paulidale self-assigned this Feb 17, 2022
policies/design-process.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@paulidale paulidale force-pushed the linking branch 4 times, most recently from 3c8e844 to 6cde10a Compare February 22, 2022 00:38
Copy link
Contributor

@mspncp mspncp left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just a nit, at your discretion.

policies/api-compat.md Show resolved Hide resolved
policies/api-compat.md Show resolved Hide resolved
policies/testing.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
policies/documentation-policy.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@paulidale paulidale added the ready to vote The policy change proposal is ready to be voted on by the OTC label Mar 4, 2022
@paulidale
Copy link
Contributor Author

Vote for accepting the policy at the commit id 8385661 has started.

@paulidale
Copy link
Contributor Author

vote: [+1]

@paulidale paulidale added the policy change A change to a policy is being proposed label Mar 4, 2022
@mspncp
Copy link
Contributor

mspncp commented Mar 4, 2022

vote: [+1]

@t-j-h
Copy link
Member

t-j-h commented Mar 4, 2022

Vote: [+1]

3 similar comments
@t8m
Copy link
Member

t8m commented Mar 4, 2022

Vote: [+1]

@mattcaswell
Copy link
Member

Vote: [+1]

@beldmit
Copy link
Member

beldmit commented Mar 4, 2022

Vote: [+1]

@levitte
Copy link
Member

levitte commented Mar 4, 2022

Vote: [+1]

(with reservation; we may want to think a bit more about the strict language policy... but I think that can be left for another PR and vote)

@romen
Copy link
Member

romen commented Mar 4, 2022

@paulidale
Copy link
Contributor Author

Those links should come good with both pull requests merged.
The vote here has passed, the vote on openssl/general-policies#10 is one shy of passing.

@slontis
Copy link
Member

slontis commented Mar 8, 2022

Vote: [+1]

@paulidale
Copy link
Contributor Author

Vote results:

Topic: Accept the glossary links as at commit id 8385661
comment: this requires openssl/general-policies#10
Proposed by: Pauli
Issue link: https://github.com/openssl/technical-policies/pull/27
Public: yes
Opened: 2022-03-04
Closed: 2022-03-09
Accepted:  yes  (for: 8, against: 0, abstained: 1, not voted: 1)

  Dmitry     [+1]
  Matt       [+1]
  Pauli      [+1]
  Tim        [+1]
  Richard    [+1]
  Shane      [+1]
  Tomas      [+1]
  Kurt       [  ]
  Matthias   [+1]
  Nicola     [+0]

@paulidale paulidale closed this Mar 9, 2022
@paulidale paulidale deleted the linking branch March 9, 2022 00:03
@paulidale paulidale added accepted The policy change proposal was accepted by an OTC vote and removed ready to vote The policy change proposal is ready to be voted on by the OTC labels Mar 9, 2022
@kroeckx
Copy link
Member

kroeckx commented Mar 9, 2022

vote +1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
accepted The policy change proposal was accepted by an OTC vote policy change A change to a policy is being proposed
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants