You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Are being recommended in Id to be changed to disused:railroad=yes
The issue here is that it removes a key identifier (such as it being a switch)
Solution: Per OSM Wiki, have the add tag instead be disused:railway=<feature> such as disused:railway=switch. So ultimately it would instead look like:
Potentially worth fixing for other railway features (e.g. signal) as well if similar Issue suggestion logic applies to them.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Are being recommended in Id to be changed to disused:railroad=yes
The issue here is that it removes a key identifier (such as it being a switch)
It seems it is not limited to switches. Disused train station disused=yes + railway=station is being replaced with disused:railway=yes (per #7119 (comment)). The railway upgrade is not following the Lifecycle prefix schema.
You use disused:railway=yes only if the type of railway element that it used to be is unknown.
Problem:
Nodes tagged like this:
Are being recommended in Id to be changed to
disused:railroad=yes
The issue here is that it removes a key identifier (such as it being a switch)
Solution:
Per OSM Wiki, have the add tag instead be
disused:railway=<feature>
such asdisused:railway=switch
. So ultimately it would instead look like:Potentially worth fixing for other railway features (e.g. signal) as well if similar Issue suggestion logic applies to them.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: