Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Maxar (Premium) is not Maxar's Premium layer #8852

Closed
rivermont opened this issue Dec 13, 2021 · 14 comments
Closed

Maxar (Premium) is not Maxar's Premium layer #8852

rivermont opened this issue Dec 13, 2021 · 14 comments
Labels
bug A bug - let's fix this! priority A top priority issue that has a big impact or matter most to new mappers question Not Actionable - just a question about something

Comments

@rivermont
Copy link
Contributor

The layer in iD listed as 'Maxar Premium Imagery' seems to be using the layer that JOSM calls Maxar Standard Imagery, which has older imagery than a different layer that JOSM has as 'Maxar Premium Imagery'.

The following vintage layers seem to match JOSM's 'Premium' and 'Standard' layers respectively, and the second also seems to match iD's Premium.

@tyrasd tyrasd added the question Not Actionable - just a question about something label Dec 13, 2021
@tordans
Copy link
Collaborator

tordans commented Dec 13, 2021

Offtopic @rivermont: What is the URLs to those date visualizations?

@mvexel
Copy link
Contributor

mvexel commented Dec 14, 2021

@tordans (copying from Slack)

https://discover.digitalglobe.com: filter by Type-Mosaic and Line-Vivid Standard, the two results seem to be what JOSM has, at least for the area I checked

@Mahabarata
Copy link

see also #1217 and my next comment on 6 Nov 2021.

@maGIScian
Copy link

I stopped eating my sausages and mash and drinking my beer to add to this. That's how serious it is. Validators are validating tasks mapped in standard, practically remapping everything. This is happening in our projects in Mozambique and some areas of DRC...

@Jorieke
Copy link

Jorieke commented Feb 1, 2022

Yes, despite the beer and sausages of @maGIScian he is right, we are encountering the same issue with for example some of our mapping projects in Mozambique. In JOSM there is no issue, you have like usually the Maxar Standard layer and the Maxar Premium layer. It is only in ID that this is an problem. In ID you have listed Maxar Premium in the background layers, but it is thus actually Maxar Standard imagery.

It looks thus that it is an issue with ID, because JOSM can do it, so I guess ID must be able to do it too?

@maGIScian
Copy link

See some background information on how this affects us at https://hotosm.slack.com/archives/C4GLC45PY/p1642582282025900

@tyrasd
Copy link
Member

tyrasd commented Feb 2, 2022

Hey all. I'm really sorry that resolving this takes longer than anticipated.

The problem is that Maxar communicated to us (@mbrzakovic) that the "Maxar Premium" layer in iD actually corresponds to the "Maxar Premium" product. I didn't want to change the layers without confirmation from Maxar, that there was indeed a mixup of the two products. Unfortunately, we didn't hear back from them when we asked for clarification shortly after this issue was raised here.

In ID you have listed Maxar Premium in the background layers, but it is thus actually Maxar Standard imagery.

Can you please tell me how you came this this conclusion? I didn't find a way to definitely rule out the (unlikely) possibility that the layer is correct in iD and just reversed on JOSM's side.

@maGIScian
Copy link

Hi Martin, I'd be happy to have a call with you to demonstrate how we came to this conclusion and how it affects us. Please email me: andries.heyns@london.msf.org and we can set up a call, even today. It's a serious issue and definitely not Premium everywhere as they say.

@Jorieke
Copy link

Jorieke commented Feb 2, 2022

@tyrasd many thanks for looking into this!!

@tyrasd tyrasd added bug A bug - let's fix this! priority A top priority issue that has a big impact or matter most to new mappers labels Feb 2, 2022
@tyrasd
Copy link
Member

tyrasd commented Feb 8, 2022

This was now fixed by Maxar. 🎉 The iD profile should now return the most recent Maxar imagery (like in JOSM). PS: I noticed that in some locations the servers still have a few of the old tiles cached, but that should resolve itself relatively soon.

@tyrasd tyrasd closed this as completed Feb 8, 2022
@rivermont
Copy link
Contributor Author

Can confirm that the area I had compared seems to have the newer stuff now!

@maGIScian
Copy link

maGIScian commented Feb 8, 2022 via email

@Jorieke
Copy link

Jorieke commented Feb 9, 2022

Yesss, it seems to work fine now!!
Many thanks Martin and Maxar!!

@pedrito1414
Copy link

Echoing thanks on resolving this!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug A bug - let's fix this! priority A top priority issue that has a big impact or matter most to new mappers question Not Actionable - just a question about something
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

8 participants