Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Missing "fig" value in format attribute of imagedta #43

Closed
tomschr opened this issue Feb 7, 2018 · 0 comments
Closed

Missing "fig" value in format attribute of imagedta #43

tomschr opened this issue Feb 7, 2018 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
bug 🐛 Something isn't working as expected
Milestone

Comments

@tomschr
Copy link
Contributor

tomschr commented Feb 7, 2018

Problem Description

The list of possible values does not contain the fig value inside the imagedata/@format attribute.

Expected Behaviour

Should be available in format attribute.

@tomschr tomschr added the bug 🐛 Something isn't working as expected label Feb 7, 2018
@tomschr tomschr self-assigned this Feb 7, 2018
@tomschr tomschr added this to the 1.0.3 milestone Feb 7, 2018
@tomschr tomschr closed this as completed in 8cbe6ab Feb 7, 2018
tomschr added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 9, 2018
* Correct version in GeekoDoc schema
* Add missing 'fig' value (#43)
* Improve test suite
tomschr added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 22, 2018
Bugfix release 1.0.3

Geekodoc:
 * disallow xml:id on child elements of table (#39)
 * Missing "fig" value in format attribute of imagedta (#43)
 * add missing holder tag (#46)
 * integrate its:translate (#45)
 * output XSLT stylesheet from Schematron validation (#49)
 * remove action in keycombo (#50)
 * reduce content model in screen (#51)
 * remove procedure from table entry (#56)

 Others:
 * Make sure GeekoDoc is available in OBS/IBS, so we can use
   it from DC file (#33)

Novdoc:
  no changes
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug 🐛 Something isn't working as expected
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant