GV not evaluated properly for a>b or a<b

[filago]

It appears that the GV value used to determine a Logical Switch with a>b or a<b is ~1/10 the actual GV value. This is with 2.1.7; I didn't check other versions.

Example:
SF1: ON Adjust GV1 Source S1
L1: a>b, Thr, S1
L2: a>b, Thr, GV1
L3: a<b, GV1, Thr

I believe L1-L3 are logically equivalent so they should go ON/OFF together, but they don't. L1 behaves as expected, going ON when Thr exceeds S1 value. But L2 and L3 go ON when Thr exceeds ~1/10 the S1 value.

[kilrah]

See here for an explanation:
#1361

[filago]

OK, thanks. My apologies for not researching to find that this is intended behavior for now.

#3185 indicates that it may be resolved at some point.