[test] Lua tests for netjson monitoring

[devkapilbansal]

Closes #7

[devkapilbansal]

I split netjson_monitoring.lua across multiple files for now. Will add tests for those files and then for netjson_monitoring at end.
Will restructure files and tests at end.

[nemesifier]

Here's some suggestions

[devkapilbansal]

Updating the base branch from gsoc21 to issues/28-qa-check for now. Will change it once #30 is merged

[nemesifier]

ubus call iwinfo associlist '{"device": "<interface_name>"}, for a mesh interface:

{
  "results": [
    {
      "mac": "00:00:00:00:00:00",
      "signal": -76,
      "signal_avg": -76,
      "noise": -87,
      "inactive": 0,
      "connected_time": 314439,
      "thr": 148687,
      "authorized": true,
      "authenticated": true,
      "preamble": "long",
      "wme": true,
      "mfp": true,
      "tdls": false,
      "mesh llid": 0,
      "mesh plid": 0,
      "mesh plink": "ESTAB",
      "mesh local PS": "ACTIVE",
      "mesh peer PS": "ACTIVE",
      "mesh non-peer PS": "ACTIVE",
      "rx": {
        "drop_misc": 610279,
        "packets": 40424675,
        "bytes": 280218466,
        "ht": false,
        "vht": true,
        "mhz": 80,
        "rate": 195000,
        "mcs": 1,
        "nss": 3,
        "short_gi": true
      },
      "tx": {
        "failed": 2377,
        "retries": 11358818,
        "packets": 50325775,
        "bytes": 124429140,
        "ht": false,
        "vht": true,
        "mhz": 80,
        "rate": 195000,
        "mcs": 1,
        "nss": 3,
        "short_gi": true
      }
    }
  ]
}

{
  "results": [
    {
      "mac": "00:00:00:00:00:00",
      "signal": -67,
      "signal_avg": -65,
      "noise": 0,
      "inactive": 6996,
      "connected_time": 314507,
      "thr": 4500,
      "authorized": true,
      "authenticated": true,
      "preamble": "long",
      "wme": true,
      "mfp": true,
      "tdls": false,
      "mesh llid": 0,
      "mesh plid": 0,
      "mesh plink": "ESTAB",
      "mesh local PS": "ACTIVE",
      "mesh peer PS": "ACTIVE",
      "mesh non-peer PS": "ACTIVE",
      "rx": {
        "drop_misc": 585666,
        "packets": 5533127,
        "bytes": 445412093,
        "ht": true,
        "vht": false,
        "mhz": 20,
        "rate": 6500,
        "mcs": 0,
        "40mhz": false,
        "short_gi": false
      },
      "tx": {
        "failed": 0,
        "retries": 5,
        "packets": 12,
        "bytes": 1173,
        "ht": true,
        "vht": false,
        "mhz": 20,
        "rate": 6500,
        "mcs": 0,
        "40mhz": false,
        "short_gi": false
      }
    }
  ]
}

[nemesifier]

@devkapilbansal some minor concerns below.

Also, please add the coveralls badge in the README.

[nemesifier]

Tested the docs and ran the tests, found the minor issues below.

[nemesifier]

I still can't get the deamon to work and I do not know what is going on.

Fri Jul 16 10:05:46 2021 daemon.info monitoring: OpenWISP monitoring daemon started
Fri Jul 16 10:06:12 2021 daemon.info procd: Instance openwisp_monitoring::openwisp_monitoring_monitoring s in a crash loop 6 crashes, 0 seconds since last crash

@devkapilbansal are you testing the build produced by this thing on OpenWRT?

[devkapilbansal]

I still can't get the deamon to work and I do not know what is going on.

Fri Jul 16 10:05:46 2021 daemon.info monitoring: OpenWISP monitoring daemon started
Fri Jul 16 10:06:12 2021 daemon.info procd: Instance openwisp_monitoring::openwisp_monitoring_monitoring s in a crash loop 6 crashes, 0 seconds since last crash

@devkapilbansal are you testing the build produced by this thing on OpenWRT?

Hi, I fixed this errors in #42
I think this should be tested after it is merged.

[nemesifier]

I still can't get the deamon to work and I do not know what is going on.

Fri Jul 16 10:05:46 2021 daemon.info monitoring: OpenWISP monitoring daemon started
Fri Jul 16 10:06:12 2021 daemon.info procd: Instance openwisp_monitoring::openwisp_monitoring_monitoring s in a crash loop 6 crashes, 0 seconds since last crash

@devkapilbansal are you testing the build produced by this thing on OpenWRT?

Hi, I fixed this errors in #42
I think this should be tested after it is merged.

@devkapilbansal ok, please fix the minor issues pointed out at the docs so I can merge this.

[devkapilbansal]

Hi @nemesisdesign,
I updated the documentation and remove the noise from the tests.