Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

luci-mod-network: improve descriptions for DSL annex option values #6452

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 3, 2023

Conversation

janh
Copy link
Contributor

@janh janh commented Jul 2, 2023

Spell out the names of the DSL standards to make the options easier to understand. For modems supporting VDSL, also mention clearly which of the options actually set the bits for VDSL2.

As the items now start with the name of an ADSL standard, use that for ordering. The generic variants including VDSL2 support stay at the top, as they should be a good choice in almost all cases.

(I think ideally it would also be nice to highlight the first few options (especially the A/L/M and the B/J option) in some way, as one of those should be the right choice in almost all cases. But I'm not sure if there is good way to do that.)

Spell out the names of the DSL standards to make the options easier to
understand. For modems supporting VDSL, also mention clearly which of
the options actually set the bits for VDSL2.

As the items now start with the name of an ADSL standard, use that for
ordering. The generic variants including VDSL2 support stay at the top,
as they should be a good choice in almost all cases.

Signed-off-by: Jan Hoffmann <jan@3e8.eu>
@systemcrash
Copy link
Contributor

@feckert feckert merged commit b06de7e into openwrt:master Jul 3, 2023
2 checks passed
@feckert
Copy link
Member

feckert commented Jul 3, 2023

Thanks!

@feckert
Copy link
Member

feckert commented Jul 3, 2023

Also cherry-picked this to openwrt-23.05 8343c52

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants