Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

libs/popt: Remove rpm5.org as source URL #2141

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

diizzyy
Copy link
Contributor

@diizzyy diizzyy commented Jun 17, 2019

rpm5.org is once again dead/down, remove it permanently
Change URL to archive.org snapshot

Signed-off-by: Daniel Engberg daniel.engberg.lists@pyret.net

rpm5.org is once again dead/down, remove it permanently
Change URL to archive.org snapshot

Signed-off-by: Daniel Engberg <daniel.engberg.lists@pyret.net>
@ynezz ynezz added the core packages pull request/issue for core (in-tree) packages label Jun 17, 2019
@ynezz
Copy link
Member

ynezz commented Jun 17, 2019

Well, can't we just remove this package? I don't see anything depending explicitly on libpopt

@ynezz ynezz added the fix pull request contains fix for some issue label Jun 17, 2019
@diizzyy
Copy link
Contributor Author

diizzyy commented Jun 17, 2019

Uhm...no? Quite a few packages does such as rsync and Samba
https://downloads.openwrt.org/snapshots/packages/mips64_octeonplus/packages/Packages
Grep libpopt0

@ynezz
Copy link
Member

ynezz commented Jun 17, 2019

Uhm...no? Quite a few packages does such as rsync and Samba
https://downloads.openwrt.org/snapshots/packages/mips64_octeonplus/packages/Packages
Grep libpopt0

That's what I'm saying, nothing seems to be using libpopt in the main tree, just in the packages feeds, so popt should be probably removed from the main tree and moved to packages repository.

@diizzyy
Copy link
Contributor Author

diizzyy commented Jun 17, 2019

In that case we should probably move like half the package tree?

@ynezz
Copy link
Member

ynezz commented Jun 17, 2019

In that case we should probably move like half the package tree?

That's the plan, yes. Quoting from the email:

During the meetup in Hamburg we discussed about  having only the required and
actually "basic" packages inside the master  tree and move everything else to
packages feed (after reviewing what's there). I believe this will be also included in
the official summary from the meetup and discussed further afterwards.

@aon3ko
Copy link

aon3ko commented Jun 24, 2019

or use this instead?
http://ftp.rpm.org/mirror/popt/

@diizzyy
Copy link
Contributor Author

diizzyy commented Jun 25, 2019

@EXSERENS
We already have two mirrors added :-)

@diizzyy
Copy link
Contributor Author

diizzyy commented Jul 4, 2019

@ynezz
When is this going to happen, any timeline at all?

@diizzyy
Copy link
Contributor Author

diizzyy commented Jul 14, 2019

Ping

@adschm
Copy link
Member

adschm commented Oct 31, 2019

@diizzyy Since it is planned to move the package to packages repo, do we still need the patch?

@diizzyy
Copy link
Contributor Author

diizzyy commented Oct 31, 2019

@adrianschmutzler
I find it somewhat amusing that you're asking after ~5 months but I guess its better late than never. There's no roadmap or any clear directions of anything except what a one (?) induvidual wants so I'm just as clueless as everyone else outside the "team". ...and rpm5.org is still down/not working so one would expect the package tree to provide working mirrors?

@diizzyy
Copy link
Contributor Author

diizzyy commented Apr 18, 2020

Still broken, upstream doesn't seem to care so....

@diizzyy diizzyy closed this Apr 18, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
core packages pull request/issue for core (in-tree) packages fix pull request contains fix for some issue needs changes
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants