Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

internal/pkg/scaffold/olm-catalog: allow multiple RBAC files in CSV config, add operator-name field #1704

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 22, 2019

Conversation

estroz
Copy link
Member

@estroz estroz commented Jul 18, 2019

Description of the change:

Motivation for the change: users can currently add both Roles and ClusterRoles to their CSV, but they must be in the same file. role-paths allows, for example, a deploy/role.yaml and deploy/cluster_role.yaml to be read and added to a CSV.

See #1571 for operator-name details.

@estroz estroz added the olm-integration Issue relates to the OLM integration label Jul 18, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jul 18, 2019
@estroz
Copy link
Member Author

estroz commented Jul 19, 2019

/test e2e-aws-helm
/test e2e-aws-ansible
/test images

Copy link
Contributor

@dmesser dmesser left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 19, 2019
CHANGELOG.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 19, 2019
@estroz estroz requested a review from hasbro17 July 19, 2019 19:11
@estroz estroz changed the title internal/pkg/scaffold/olm-catalog: allow multiple RBAC files in CSV config internal/pkg/scaffold/olm-catalog: allow multiple RBAC files in CSV config, add operator-name field Jul 19, 2019
Copy link
Contributor

@hasbro17 hasbro17 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@estroz
Copy link
Member Author

estroz commented Jul 19, 2019

/test e2e-aws-go

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
olm-integration Issue relates to the OLM integration size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants