Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: (ansible) - Errors in the event have not been re-trigging the reconcile. #2375

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jan 14, 2020

Conversation

camilamacedo86
Copy link
Contributor

@camilamacedo86 camilamacedo86 commented Jan 8, 2020

Description of the change:
Fix issue: #2372
Errors in the event have not been re-trigging the reconcile.

Motivation for the change:
Closes #2372

Notes
Local tests to verify it can be done with the image: quay.io/camilamacedo86/ansible-operator:dev
The user POC in the #2372 was used to check.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jan 8, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jan 8, 2020
@camilamacedo86 camilamacedo86 changed the title fix: (ansible) - Errors in the event have not been re-trigging the reconcile. WIP : fix: (ansible) - Errors in the event have not been re-trigging the reconcile. Jan 8, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jan 8, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jan 9, 2020
@camilamacedo86 camilamacedo86 changed the title WIP : fix: (ansible) - Errors in the event have not been re-trigging the reconcile. fix: (ansible) - Errors in the event have not been re-trigging the reconcile. Jan 9, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jan 9, 2020
@camilamacedo86 camilamacedo86 added language/ansible Issue is related to an Ansible operator project kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. labels Jan 9, 2020
@camilamacedo86 camilamacedo86 force-pushed the issue-2372 branch 2 times, most recently from 5142e28 to 465e68c Compare January 9, 2020 11:40
Copy link
Member

@fabianvf fabianvf left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm, @shawn-hurley maybe you want to have a quick look if you have a sec

@camilamacedo86 camilamacedo86 added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. labels Jan 13, 2020
@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

2 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jan 13, 2020
@shawn-hurley
Copy link
Member

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jan 14, 2020
@shawn-hurley
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 14, 2020
@camilamacedo86
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @shawn-hurley it was changed could you please give a look and see if it is ok for you now?

@shawn-hurley
Copy link
Member

/retest

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

2 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 14, 2020
pkg/ansible/controller/reconcile.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/ansible/controller/reconcile.go Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

@fabianvf fabianvf left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 14, 2020
@camilamacedo86 camilamacedo86 merged commit d7235f5 into operator-framework:master Jan 14, 2020
@camilamacedo86 camilamacedo86 deleted the issue-2372 branch January 14, 2020 19:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. language/ansible Issue is related to an Ansible operator project lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Ansible operator does not trigger reconcile loops after ansible failure
5 participants