Prism Launcher
Replies: 9 comments 4 replies
-
|
I mean - polymc already had some stuff like this:
There's no real way to prepare the github org for something happening again, unless you give admin to a random github account and chuck the password away. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
There is more that can be done. Rust (programming language) moderation has had similar "gone rogue" issues in the past, and they seem to have addressed those - might be something worth looking into? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I agree with this. There has to be some sane alternative to handling this to prevent the issue from occurring again. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
you don't have to - it's all publicly documented. just gotta find the links... https://www.theregister.com/2021/11/23/rust_moderation_team_quits/ https://blog.rust-lang.org/inside-rust/2021/12/17/follow-up-on-the-moderation-issue.html https://blog.rust-lang.org/inside-rust/2022/05/19/governance-update.html https://blog.rust-lang.org/inside-rust/2022/05/26/Concluding-events-mods.html probably more that can be found elsewhere and whatnot. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Giving admin to a new Github account, telling all the admins the password of said account would be better. You would make an e-mail adress with a random password and log out of it. All the admins would have the password of the account but none could change the password. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@Grithz, such a setup isn't supported by GitHub, because any member with a password could modify the password for all. Recovery might not be possible, considering that sharing accounts violates GH's ToS, per https://github.com/github/docs/blob/e3a169c100d6542bd8178dd47590f0047739107b/content/site-policy/github-terms/github-terms-of-service.md?plain=1#L51:~:text=A%20%E2%80%9CPersonal%20Account%E2%80%9D%20represents%20an%20individual%20User%E2%80%99s%20authorization%20to%20log%20in%20to%20and%20use%20the%20Service%20and%20serves%20as%20a%20User%E2%80%99s%20identity%20on%20GitHub. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
at that point just use GAnarchy or something. (/self-plug) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@SoniEx2, https://github.com/ganarchy/GAnarchy/blob/db85f92e9b77c691f25f3109e5040e03e7b1319c/README.md?plain=1#L9:~:text=There%20are%20not%20and%20there%20never%20will%20be%20Pull%20Requests%2C%20Merge%20Requests%20or%20Email
alone prevents it being a suitable replacement. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
at this point you would also need to use smth independent like Codeberg and not Github cause Github could go rogue too |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
True, but then you lose tons of activity because no one wants to create yet-another account. Anxiously awaiting gitlab federated accounts... |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Forgejo is getting AP federated :P |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@CutestNekoAqua, you can track it at https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/59#issuecomment-2027452, if you're interested. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@SoniEx2, https://github.com/orgs/PrismLauncher/discussions/17#discussion-4482586 appears to be a more popular thread discussing the same topic. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
What are the current plans to make this project sabotage-resistant so that what happened once can't happen again?
(Also the issue templates need updating)
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions