Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

s390x: reselect svirt console to extract SUT pty #4369

Conversation

Soulofdestiny
Copy link
Contributor

@Soulofdestiny Soulofdestiny commented Feb 7, 2018

verification run: http://opeth/tests/70
@rwx788 @nicksinger

@mnowaksuse maybe also interesting for you - though it should not influence other svirt tests

Copy link
Member

@rwx788 rwx788 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

lib/utils.pm Outdated
@@ -114,6 +114,9 @@ sub unlock_if_encrypted {
return unless get_var("ENCRYPT");

if (check_var('ARCH', 's390x') && check_var('BACKEND', 'svirt')) {
# we need to reset the svirt console to extract the pty variable correctly
console('svirt')->reset;
select_console('svirt');
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

IIUC the wrong location. It needs to be set whenever we reboot machines not here

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yeah - also discussed with @rwx788, makes sense to move to redefine_svirt_domain

@Soulofdestiny
Copy link
Contributor Author

changed - new verification run: http://opeth/tests/70
(also updated in initial description)

@Soulofdestiny
Copy link
Contributor Author

new verification run passed

@okurz okurz removed the notready label Feb 7, 2018
@okurz
Copy link
Member

okurz commented Feb 7, 2018

why is http://opeth/tests/70#step/boot_encrypt/2 still red then?

and can you explain again why we have all these black screenshots in http://opeth/tests/70#step/redefine_svirt_domain/1 ? I thought we tried to avoid these. Maybe @coolo can help us understand?

@Soulofdestiny
Copy link
Contributor Author

that's indeed a good question - it timed out... but passphrase was typed...

@Soulofdestiny
Copy link
Contributor Author

not needed anymore, was fixed in the meantime

@Soulofdestiny Soulofdestiny deleted the check_s390_lvm_full_encrypt branch March 19, 2018 07:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
3 participants