Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Swap initialization of autotest and backend #2213

Closed

Conversation

kalikiana
Copy link
Member

Like #2206 but with #2211 to confirm if it would fail on CI.

See: https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/81899

And remove the misleading and unused output handling.

See: https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/120786
@kalikiana kalikiana changed the title Move stop_autotest into CommandHandler Swap initialization of autotest and backend Nov 21, 2022
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 21, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #2213 (0feda38) into master (dee0e60) will decrease coverage by 0.03%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

❗ Current head 0feda38 differs from pull request most recent head d730ea3. Consider uploading reports for the commit d730ea3 to get more accurate results

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2213      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   92.27%   92.23%   -0.04%     
==========================================
  Files         157      157              
  Lines       15218    15218              
==========================================
- Hits        14042    14037       -5     
- Misses       1176     1181       +5     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
t/14-isotovideo.t 99.58% <100.00%> (ø)
consoles/VNC.pm 98.83% <0.00%> (-1.17%) ⬇️
t/data/tests/bar/baz.pm
t/data/tests/foo.pm 100.00% <0.00%> (ø)

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

Analoguous to the problematic refactoring.
@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Nov 22, 2022

This pull request is now in conflicts. Could you fix it? 🙏

1 similar comment
@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Jan 6, 2023

This pull request is now in conflicts. Could you fix it? 🙏

@kalikiana kalikiana closed this Jan 6, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant