-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 859
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add the remaining common Marriott brands #3091
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for cleaning up these entries! Hopefully we can avoid repurposing QIDs as much as possible. By ensuring that brand:wikidata
can stand on its own unambiguously, we maximize the tag’s utility for data consumers other than editor validators.
I didn't get a chance to look too closely at this, but whatever you want to do is fine with me.. 👍 |
I still need to carve out some time to double check my own thoughts here on some of the brands. The entire hotel industry is in the middle of a rebranding with the recent mergers and it makes this tricky. So many brands are using 2 or 3 different names for the same brand. |
It really is pretty wild. I look through our hotel list and wonder like.. are the hotels ok? Why are they doing this? Nobody else does this - everyone else consolidates little brands into big ones like it's a winner-take-all competition. I would love it if someone someday finds NSI and OSM useful to research business trends like this. |
I made a few tweaks to this. Thanks for the detailed review @1ec5. I'll make a few more updates to the IDs and double check this brand mess everyone is in the middle of. |
Wow they have a lot of brands. I'm going to see if I can track down more specific wikidata / wikipedia entries for them, but they're all owned by Marriott so using that wikidata is better than nothing. I also fixed the courtyard entry to match the name field and updated delta -> delta hotels since that's the signage and the brand naming the Marriott uses. Signed-off-by: Tim Smith <tsmith@chef.io>
Signed-off-by: Tim Smith <tsmith@chef.io>
Signed-off-by: Tim Smith <tsmith@chef.io>
This is from their website Signed-off-by: Tim Smith <tsmith@chef.io>
Let's not limit this to CA / US Signed-off-by: Tim Smith <tsmith@chef.io>
From their website Signed-off-by: Tim Smith <tsmith@chef.io>
Signed-off-by: Tim Smith <tsmith@chef.io>
These hotels are named Renaissance CITY not Renaissance Hotel CITY. Signed-off-by: Tim Smith <tsmith@chef.io>
Over 100 locations all over the world. Signed-off-by: Tim Smith <tsmith@chef.io>
Signed-off-by: Tim Smith <tsmith@chef.io>
Signed-off-by: Tim Smith <tsmith@chef.io>
They're not in OSM worldwide, but they exist Signed-off-by: Tim Smith <tsmith@chef.io>
As they rebrand into the US it'll be important that both work in search. Signed-off-by: Tim Smith <tsmith@chef.io>
Signed-off-by: Tim Smith <tsmith@chef.io>
Signed-off-by: Tim Smith <tsmith@chef.io>
Signed-off-by: Tim Smith <tsmith@chef.io>
Co-Authored-By: Malcolm Smith <malcolmsmith18@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: Malcolm Smith <malcolmsmith18@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: Malcolm Smith <malcolmsmith18@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: Malcolm Smith <malcolmsmith18@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: Malcolm Smith <malcolmsmith18@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: Malcolm Smith <malcolmsmith18@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: Minh Nguyễn <mxn@1ec5.org>
Co-Authored-By: Minh Nguyễn <mxn@1ec5.org>
Co-Authored-By: Minh Nguyễn <mxn@1ec5.org>
Signed-off-by: Tim Smith <tsmith@chef.io>
Wow they have a lot of brands. I think this adds all the major ones and cleans up some bad brand vs company issues + restrictive country codes.
I also split out Fairfield Inn and Fairfield Inn & Suites. This one is total mess. They appear to be rebranding the whole lineup, but depending on what type of location and where you are it's either Fairfield by Marriott, Fairfield Inn, or Fairfield Inn & Suites. Hopefully they rebrand them all in the next few years and we can fix it, but this is close enough for now and allows folks to continue to distinguish the suite variant.
Signed-off-by: Tim Smith tsmith@chef.io