perf(p2p/conn): Remove a minint call that was appearing in write pack… #42
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…et delays (backport cometbft#2952) (cometbft#2975) Somehow this minint call is appearing in CPU profiles. Its too large of an appearance to be declared as noise, but I really don't get why its there. Must be some weird system effect I don't get. (perhaps due to being the result of a function call for a slice index? idk) This PR just removes the function call, since its not needed, as we already branch on the if statement. Profile showing it:  Contributes a 3% improvement to cometbft#2951 --- #### PR checklist - [x] Tests written/updated - fully compatible with what already exists - [x] Changelog entry added in `.changelog` (we use [unclog](https://github.com/informalsystems/unclog) to manage our changelog) - [x] Updated relevant documentation (`docs/` or `spec/`) and code comments - [x] Title follows the [Conventional Commits](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/) spec <hr>This is an automatic backport of pull request cometbft#2952 done by [Mergify](https://mergify.com). --------- Co-authored-by: Dev Ojha <ValarDragon@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Anton Kaliaev <anton.kalyaev@gmail.com>
czarcas7ic
added
S:backport/v24
mergify bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 3, 2024
…et delays (backport cometbft#2952) (cometbft#2975) (#42) Somehow this minint call is appearing in CPU profiles. Its too large of an appearance to be declared as noise, but I really don't get why its there. Must be some weird system effect I don't get. (perhaps due to being the result of a function call for a slice index? idk) This PR just removes the function call, since its not needed, as we already branch on the if statement. Profile showing it:  Contributes a 3% improvement to cometbft#2951 --- #### PR checklist - [x] Tests written/updated - fully compatible with what already exists - [x] Changelog entry added in `.changelog` (we use [unclog](https://github.com/informalsystems/unclog) to manage our changelog) - [x] Updated relevant documentation (`docs/` or `spec/`) and code comments - [x] Title follows the [Conventional Commits](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/) spec <hr>This is an automatic backport of pull request cometbft#2952 done by [Mergify](https://mergify.com). --------- Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Dev Ojha <ValarDragon@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Anton Kaliaev <anton.kalyaev@gmail.com> (cherry picked from commit 9ee1d13)
mergify bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 3, 2024
…et delays (backport cometbft#2952) (cometbft#2975) (#42) Somehow this minint call is appearing in CPU profiles. Its too large of an appearance to be declared as noise, but I really don't get why its there. Must be some weird system effect I don't get. (perhaps due to being the result of a function call for a slice index? idk) This PR just removes the function call, since its not needed, as we already branch on the if statement. Profile showing it:  Contributes a 3% improvement to cometbft#2951 --- #### PR checklist - [x] Tests written/updated - fully compatible with what already exists - [x] Changelog entry added in `.changelog` (we use [unclog](https://github.com/informalsystems/unclog) to manage our changelog) - [x] Updated relevant documentation (`docs/` or `spec/`) and code comments - [x] Title follows the [Conventional Commits](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/) spec <hr>This is an automatic backport of pull request cometbft#2952 done by [Mergify](https://mergify.com). --------- Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Dev Ojha <ValarDragon@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Anton Kaliaev <anton.kalyaev@gmail.com> (cherry picked from commit 9ee1d13)
This was referenced May 3, 2024
czarcas7ic
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 3, 2024
…et delays (backport cometbft#2952) (cometbft#2975) (#42) (#52) Somehow this minint call is appearing in CPU profiles. Its too large of an appearance to be declared as noise, but I really don't get why its there. Must be some weird system effect I don't get. (perhaps due to being the result of a function call for a slice index? idk) This PR just removes the function call, since its not needed, as we already branch on the if statement. Profile showing it:  Contributes a 3% improvement to cometbft#2951 --- #### PR checklist - [x] Tests written/updated - fully compatible with what already exists - [x] Changelog entry added in `.changelog` (we use [unclog](https://github.com/informalsystems/unclog) to manage our changelog) - [x] Updated relevant documentation (`docs/` or `spec/`) and code comments - [x] Title follows the [Conventional Commits](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/) spec <hr>This is an automatic backport of pull request cometbft#2952 done by [Mergify](https://mergify.com). --------- Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Dev Ojha <ValarDragon@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Anton Kaliaev <anton.kalyaev@gmail.com> (cherry picked from commit 9ee1d13) Co-authored-by: Adam Tucker <adam@osmosis.team>
czarcas7ic
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 3, 2024
…et delays (backport cometbft#2952) (cometbft#2975) (#42) (#53) Somehow this minint call is appearing in CPU profiles. Its too large of an appearance to be declared as noise, but I really don't get why its there. Must be some weird system effect I don't get. (perhaps due to being the result of a function call for a slice index? idk) This PR just removes the function call, since its not needed, as we already branch on the if statement. Profile showing it:  Contributes a 3% improvement to cometbft#2951 --- #### PR checklist - [x] Tests written/updated - fully compatible with what already exists - [x] Changelog entry added in `.changelog` (we use [unclog](https://github.com/informalsystems/unclog) to manage our changelog) - [x] Updated relevant documentation (`docs/` or `spec/`) and code comments - [x] Title follows the [Conventional Commits](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/) spec <hr>This is an automatic backport of pull request cometbft#2952 done by [Mergify](https://mergify.com). --------- Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Dev Ojha <ValarDragon@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Anton Kaliaev <anton.kalyaev@gmail.com> (cherry picked from commit 9ee1d13) Co-authored-by: Adam Tucker <adam@osmosis.team>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
…et delays (backport cometbft#2952) (cometbft#2975)
Somehow this minint call is appearing in CPU profiles. Its too large of an appearance to be declared as noise, but I really don't get why its there. Must be some weird system effect I don't get. (perhaps due to being the result of a function call for a slice index? idk)
This PR just removes the function call, since its not needed, as we already branch on the if statement.
Profile showing it:
Contributes a 3% improvement to cometbft#2951
PR checklist
.changelog(we use unclog to manage our changelog)docs/orspec/) and code commentsThis is an automatic backport of pull request perf(p2p/conn): Remove a minint call that was appearing in write packet delays cometbft/cometbft#2952 done by Mergify.
PR checklist
.changelog(we use unclog to manage our changelog)docs/orspec/) and code comments