Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Get more contributors #36

Open
directionless opened this issue Oct 17, 2019 · 1 comment
Open

Get more contributors #36

directionless opened this issue Oct 17, 2019 · 1 comment
Labels
help wanted Extra attention is needed

Comments

@directionless
Copy link
Member

directionless commented Oct 17, 2019

In office hours 2019-10-15 we expressed an interest in getting more people as contributors. We both need to get some initial people, and also need to [eventually] develop a process for nominating them.

cc: @theopolis, @zwass, @alessandrogario

@directionless
Copy link
Member Author

My initial reactions are:

  1. YES PLEASE
  2. My thoughts about governance are best capture'd by wix's model. I think whatever we do, we'll still have non-TSC contributors, so I don't think we need to block on that. I also think we should start seeing how things shape up.
  3. I am deeply unsure about what the process should look like. I want to be able to discuss people in closed session, but that's contrary to my desire to have discussions public. Maybe the middle ground is to allow public nominations, and allow the TSC to chatter privately? Maybe we require unanimous consent?
  4. I'm pretty sure how we use CODEOWNERS will evolve.
  5. I'm tempted to push some code based config tool somewhere. That would let us have a clear PR trail for some of this. But let's not block on it.

@theopolis theopolis added the help wanted Extra attention is needed label Jul 8, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
help wanted Extra attention is needed
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants