-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 98
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Qualification ZIP file - 2 or 3 files? #39
Comments
Original comment by Nate Koenig (Bitbucket: Nathan Koenig). Thanks. I've update the subt wiki to indicate that three files are required. |
Original comment by Nate Koenig (Bitbucket: Nathan Koenig).
Updated wiki to match the qualification guide. |
Original comment by Martin Dlouhy (Bitbucket: robotikacz).
|
Original comment by Martin Dlouhy (Bitbucket: robotikacz). Thank you Nathan for update - could you maybe please also update the command in "3. Create the final zip file", i.e. to add on the command line "narrative.md"? For me it is still not clear if we should submit improvements and what is the current threshold for qualification? Is there any "score board" with other teams? I did not realize that it is manual work so maybe multiple submissions are discouraged? |
Original comment by Martin Dlouhy (Bitbucket: robotikacz).
|
Original comment by Nate Koenig (Bitbucket: Nathan Koenig). The following text has been added to the wiki: There are sixteen artifacts in the tunnel qualification world. In order to pass qualifications, you will need to find at least half of these artifacts. For each successful artifact found, you can receive a minimum score of 3 and a maximum score of 9. The more accurate, in Euclidean distance, your artifact report is the higher the score. A minimum overall score of 24 is required, which is 8 artifacts each with a value of 3. Keep in mind that a score of 24 is not the only requirement, you must find at least 8 artifacts. |
Original comment by Nate Koenig (Bitbucket: Nathan Koenig). A leaderboard that will display team scores is under development. We are not discouraging multiple submissions from teams, but it would be good to refrain from inundating us with numerous submissions. |
Original comment by Martin Dlouhy (Bitbucket: robotikacz). Thank you Nathan for update. Is there a change in scoring since 21st Dec 2018? At that time the point for artifact was multiplied by up to 3 times for artifact precision and the same how fast you report it. Our first attempt was in 20 minutes and it was 1 point only. The second attempt (the same artifact) was 4 points:
Note, that draft "SubT_Challenge_Competition_Rules_Tunnel_Circuit.pdf" section 11.1 talks only about 1 point for 5 meter precision. |
Original comment by Nate Koenig (Bitbucket: Nathan Koenig). Our original scoring algorithm predated the competition rules. Pull request #107 will bring the scoring algorithm inline with the competition rules. Once merged, I'll update the wiki page to match. |
Original comment by Martin Dlouhy (Bitbucket: robotikacz). OK, thank you |
Original comment by Nate Koenig (Bitbucket: Nathan Koenig).
We have merge the pull request, and updated the wiki. Feel free to re-open if the problem persists. |
Original comment by Alfredo Bencomo (Bitbucket: bencomo).
|
Original report (archived issue) by Martin Dlouhy (Bitbucket: robotikacz).
The https://osrf-migration.github.io/subt-gh-pages/#!/osrf/subt/wiki/tutorials/qual states that qualification ZIP file should contain 2 files, while SubT_Qualification_Guide.pdf says: "A submission will consist of a single zip (.zip) file that contains three files: simulation.log, subt.log, and narrative.md." ... so which one is correct?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: