Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(curations): Add a VCS curation for XMLUnit < 2.0 #194

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 7, 2024

Conversation

sschuberth
Copy link
Member

Note that XMLUnit 2.x is hosted at 1.

@sschuberth sschuberth requested a review from a team as a code owner June 6, 2024 15:18
@sschuberth sschuberth enabled auto-merge (rebase) June 6, 2024 15:18
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
- id: "Maven:xmlunit:xmlunit:(,2.0["
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

commit message: How about the following title?

feat(curations): Set the VCS info for xmlunit

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd like to emphasize it's for versions < 2 only, as 2.x versions do not have these issues anymore.

The POM, e.g. https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/xmlunit/xmlunit/1.3/xmlunit-1.3.pom, contains a `BSD-3-Clause`
license header but a non-SPDX license name tag. Also the SVN repository URL is wrong as it either points to the
view URL or hard-codes the trunk revision.
declared_license_mapping:
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same here:

feat(curations): Map a declared license for xmlunit

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I basically have no objections, but I'd just like to understand: How is that message better than mine?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For the bottom commit "curation(s)" is not mentioned twice...less redundant.
The proposed way is a bit shorter and focus a tad more on describing the effect on the curation, not so much the property used for it.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I see, thanks for explaining. I made the messages a bit more compact.

@sschuberth sschuberth requested review from fviernau and a team June 6, 2024 16:51
@fviernau fviernau disabled auto-merge June 6, 2024 20:20
Note that XMLUnit 2.x is hosted at [1].

[1]: https://github.com/xmlunit/xmlunit

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Schuberth <sebastian@doubleopen.org>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Schuberth <sebastian@doubleopen.org>
@sschuberth sschuberth enabled auto-merge (rebase) June 7, 2024 05:58
@sschuberth sschuberth merged commit 7252588 into main Jun 7, 2024
2 checks passed
@sschuberth sschuberth deleted the xmlunit-curation branch June 7, 2024 05:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants